My first impression was the name was sponsored by Jefferson Cleaners. It will be what I always will associate with the new name...
Attachments:
(32.82 KiB) Downloaded 5427 times
Railroad Forums
Moderator: AlexC
ExCon90 wrote:I think a figure around $4 million was disclosed later. The other day there was a letter in the Philadelphia Inquirer raising the question of where Jefferson got the $4 million: was it built into patients' hospital bills, or was there some other source? (Not quite the same situation as AT&T or Verizon.) No responses so far.I saw the same $4mm number. Remember that Jefferson is known as both a University and a teaching Hospital. It has a lot of money. For marketing purposes, it's chump change for them.
Jersey_Mike wrote:It also drives up the cost of medical care which we all end up paying for at the end of the day.Please explain how Dr. Mike.
Clearfield wrote:Oh come on Mr. Clearfield, maybe you've never had to write out a check to Blue Cross for $700 every month, and maybe you're unaware of Medicare's cost to taxpayers. But we stray off topic and here's some arithmetic you might be able to play around with: Considering the number of passengers using the Staion Formerly Known as Market East, and the amount Jefferson paid to plaster their name all over it, how much would it cost me to purchase the rights to Allegheny station (formerly known as 22nd St.)? I want to rename it Swampoodle for the very expensive interlocked switch and stub track aiming right at it from the the location on the Chestnut Hill West line that was formerly Westmoreland station. When will I be able to take that single-seat ride directly from Chestnut Hill West to Bryn Mawr that Professor Vuchic promised some 30 years ago? (Not that anybody really wants to make that journey.)Jersey_Mike wrote:It also drives up the cost of medical care which we all end up paying for at the end of the day.Please explain how Dr. Mike.
westernfalls wrote:Clearly, many people do not understand that the station naming has ABSOLUTELY NO IMPACT ON HEALTHCARE COSTS. And that's understandable. In reality, the costs are controlled by the insurance companies, not the hospitals, or in this case a University. Now if IBX bought naming rights to as much as a hot dog cart I'd be screaming cost containment!Clearfield wrote:Oh come on Mr. Clearfield, maybe you've never had to write out a check to Blue Cross for $700 every monthJersey_Mike wrote:It also drives up the cost of medical care which we all end up paying for at the end of the day.Please explain how Dr. Mike.
Jersey_Mike wrote:Actually I was implying that increased health service advertising increases the overall use of healthcare which in most cases "somebody else" is paying for. It's bad public policy to allow the healthcare industry to try to convince people that they are sick and should seek out treatment. As a public agency SEPTA just might want to be more thoughtful about whom it sells its naming rights to. I don't consider hospitals to be the most scrupulous of actors right now. Unlike a more typical "transit ad", selling the name directly associates Jefferson Hospital and SEPTA. Remember Enron field?Fair enough.
Clearfield wrote:Driving a SEPTA vehicle is a dangerous occupation for a lot of reasons, including the behavior of the public, but one where the drivers know what they're in for when they apply for the job.Do city drivers get paid more than suburban drivers?
loufah wrote:I don't know. Someone on this board must know though.Clearfield wrote:Driving a SEPTA vehicle is a dangerous occupation for a lot of reasons, including the behavior of the public, but one where the drivers know what they're in for when they apply for the job.Do city drivers get paid more than suburban drivers?