CS wrote:Huh???
I was just down there at NYCTA - that place is awful! Dirty, old, smelly, HOT, umcomfortable - Boylston is better than most stations I saw on the 2 train in Brooklyn.
I've been to both NYC and Boston several times this year. My opinions in response to your post are:
Dirty
Stations – those in both Manhattan and downtown Boston are generally cleaner than the outlying stations on the lines.
Subway cars - I found NYC's to be cleaner than cars on the MBTA. MBTA subway cars always seem to have newspapers and other trash on the seats and floors. In NYC, cars are cleaned at the terminals after each trip.
Buses – no contest, NYCT buses have it all over MBTA buses.
old
The MBTA does have a larger number of modernized stations, but newer isn’t necessarily better if they don’t keep the stations well maintained.
smelly
Aside from passengers who don’t use deodorant and occasionally use dark corners as public restrooms (which both systems have), I don’t find the odors of either system to be offensive.
HOT, umcomfortable
Yes, NYC's subways are hot in the summertime - I've been told it's because the lines are mostly right under the streets and because of the extensive steel used in its construction, which retains heat. But the A/C systems on the cars work very well.
Boylston is better than most stations I saw on the 2 train in Brooklyn.
Well, I haven’t ridden the 2 in Brooklyn in years, but most of the NYC subway stations I’ve been to recently were better than Boylston.
JD