by The ViRoCo
Railroad Forums
Moderators: sery2831, CRail
Bramdeisroberts wrote:It's good to see that some managerial heads are starting to roll over this. The lack of any sort of foul-weather contingency plan reeks of inept management. Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean that it won't happen, and planning for the unexpected is one of the key things that separates effective management from inept management.Well, Ms. Scott only took the job in Dec 2012. So she's only been here for 2 years. Which is not a lot of time to accomplish anything, especially if said contingency plans require equipment purchasing. This is also a completely unprecedented and unheard of amount of snow and duration.
Boston has some of the best hospitals, academic institutions, and public safety personnel in the world, so why can't we have one of the best public transit systems in the world as well? It's time we held the T to the same standard that we hold everything else in this town to.Boston has some of the best funded hospitals and academic institutions in the world, and I'm pretty sure the public safety personnel are at least on par with other major cities. Maybe you could hold the MBTA to the same standard if anyone was actually willing to fund it to that standard. Which they haven't for decades.
Bramdeisroberts wrote:It's good to see that some managerial heads are starting to roll over this.Very little of this is Beverly Scott's fault. We tore down two open deck elevated structures, and replaced them with these recycled railroad lines, which are open to the weather. We built another lengthy extension on another such line which was even more exposed. The one underground line we built is fraught with its own problems and includes a 10 mph curve. Even the 1927 Dorchester Extension and 1952 Revere Extension are exposed in places. All of this cost billions, and none of it happened under the leadership currently in place! The clock was ticking, the snow bomb just exploded!
jbvb wrote:I don't know the T's MoW fleet like others do, but I have the impression that for maybe 30 or more years their snowstorm strategy has been "run trains often enough and they'll blow it/push it out of the way/pack it down". This has a low variable cost: just the operators and a couple of gangs to clear critical switches when the snow melters can't keep up. But, as has been demonstrated this February, it only works when storms aren't too big and there are warm, sunny intervals between them. And it exposes the equipment you need to carry passengers to the worst of the weather. I expect they don't even budget to break up a 6-car set for these runs, which exposes all the more equipment to the snow.Well...that probably is good enough. But you need a non-revenue fleet to take that punishment. And they don't have that anymore.
Ms. Scott inherited this. There are any number of tools the T could have bought to actually clear the line; pretty much all of them require a large gang, slow, careful operation and 3rd rail power being off. But nobody could make them a priority in the face of unsafe bridges, ancient power cables, spongy car floors etc.
jbvb wrote:Ms. Scott inherited this. There are any number of tools the T could have bought to actually clear the line; pretty much all of them require a large gang, slow, careful operation and 3rd rail power being off. But nobody could make them a priority in the face of unsafe bridges, ancient power cables, spongy car floors etc.I have a hard time believing that an organization that can afford to pay its "surface operators" *cough* bus drivers *cough* $30+ per hour PLUS pension can't find a million or two to buy a rotary plow for each of the heavy rail lines.