johnpbarlow wrote:Interesting short WBZ-TV clip from Friday 2/13/15 of Jon Keller interviewing Speaker DeLeo re: the T's defensive underfunding allegations. The Speakah says not so as under his watch there were two bond bills passed for T funding in the past few years. At approximately the two minute mark in the posted clip below, Keller says that DeLeo suggests some of the T's expansion projects might be back-burnered in favor of investing in making the current T system more reliable.
http://news.yahoo.com/video/keller-larg ... 00964.html
DeLeo already said right after the gas tax indexing ballot question votes were tabulated that there was no way in hell he was bringing any tax increase bill to a floor vote, so he has already cut off at the knees any possible avenue of addressing it this term. Finding funding is going to be more ineffective annual service cut threats to shoot the hostage, more attempts to refinance the debt at a better interest rate (though I doubt they're going to be able to do better than the most recent Patrick/Davey refinancing), and in general rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. It doesn't matter if they mothball South Coast FAIL because barely any of the funding has actually been appropriated for that giant slab of vaporware. That was one of many funding gaps in Patrick's ambitious Transportation Bill that you could drive...a train?...through because Mr. Speakah gutted the revenue sources like a fish within nanoseconds of the bill hitting the House. The implied threat here is not to the commuter rail expansion crap they really should be re-evaluating their senses on...it's DeLeo pointing a gun square at the Green Line Extension. And saying "Look at all the rhymes-with-ducks I give!" to every voter statewide.
This is the problem in a nutshell. The Commonwealth has three branches of government like any sub-unit of a representative democracy, with a legislative chamber of 160 members tasked with initiating spending bills...and this guy ends up holding all the cards as the single most powerful statewide politician by a mile. With total dictatorial control over those 160 House members, a sheepish caucus indocrinated by a half-century of fear-and-intimidation to sign their lives away to the chamber leader, and far and away (like...
far and away) the largest recipient of outside campaign donations of any politician in the state. Including all the Gov. candidates and the entire U.S. House delegation. Who controls all of the state's purse strings despite there only being 7300 votes cast for him in the town of Winthrop and a slice of Revere Beach Blvd. There may not be another state in the country where the House (or House-equivalent) chamber leader monopolizes power like Massachusetts politics structurally encourages. And you only have to look at his 3 felony-convicted predecessors in that position and the near-constant stench of deftly-averted ethics inquiries that have followed him to see what the problem is here. In the Senate too, where the chamber Prez. has had equally checkered (though with somewhat less-depressing consistency) history dating back to the Billy Bulger era as the de facto #2 strongman of Massachusetts politics. It's not even anything about DeLeo himself. It's the structural inequities of the position and absolute power corrupting absolutely. This isn't even a constitutional issue like we have a codified "Strong Speaker" government. It's just been habitual use of fear and intimidation shaped over decades by using committee assignments as weapons to enforce absolute fealty from the chamber Prez.'s caucus, and one-party rule from the complete collapse of any effective opposition party pretty much making the Speakership a hereditary monarchy of deputies-to-the-strongman.
Until the voters put more fear into their local Legislators than the Speaker or Senate Prez. does, this is always going to be the case. It wasn't always like this...this situation was conditioned through constant repetition over time. But I can't even imagine how bad things have to get for any outside pressure to affect the power imbalance in state gov't. Like I said before, it's hard to see what Baker could even do at a substantial level if he wanted to be a Mr. Fix-it whiz when the Governor is effectively the third-most powerful singular official in state gov't...and a distant third at that.