by Benny
Re-resume
Apart the sidelined units (most of which fried the prime mover), the running locomotives are not in good health with daily problems mainly to engines, turbochargers, rheostatic braking and control circuits but also simpler things like fallen windscreens or smashed seats.
Hauled stock too has troubles, especially to the rolling parts and the braking system; the worst ones are the acid tankers that, being not so numerous, are intensely used.
Undoubtably the line is a challenge but better maintenance and a lowering of the hauled tonnage with more use of double heading (also because, at high quote engines loose power due to the oxigen rarefaction) could help very much.
But the father of problems is the scantiness of motive power, made worse by the prohibition of transit on the higher part of the line for many locos and the bad fame of the double-cabs as climbers. The two C40-8Ws are the most powerful but (apart the quick failure of 1033) couldn't be used where bigger is the need of heavy haul.
The company is not "poor", the main shareholders are big mining firms, and what is needed is an injection of locomotives, powerful and adapted to the tunnels reduced loading gauge. More, as Conrail is between the shareholders and should have good knowledge about locomotives, possibly a model less troubled than C39-8s, that yet in the USA were badly renowned for turbocharger problems.
The ideal would be wiring but this would imply the enlargement of the loading gauge, the improvement of some stretches and overall the acquisition of new traffic, also in the passengers field, but these are not priorities for the company that, apparently, sees other traffics as disturbs for the ore trains.
And here comes the fundamental question: who pays? The Peruvian state has the (bad) habit of making others pay for project and building of its great works in exchange of a long term concession and in eight years the FCCA thirty years one will expire; logically, without a secured future, the company is not interested in big improvements.
Last but not least, the operator don't build loyalty with the workers; instead pays lower than the average with the result of loose frequently trained personnel and generate vandalism by unhappy people.
In the end lights but also many shadows. It's correct that, at the end of the state management, the railroad was in a more than sorry state and, thanks to the concession, it could survive although regional and national governments put many obstacles but, after a first time of big expansion ("new" stock, acquisition of the cement plant as client, the metro-wanka project, the containers etc.), now the company seems only interested in fulfill with the current contracts.
Hope it has been an interesting reading. Remember that this is only my personal opinion.
As usual, for doubts or questions ask me.
Ciao
Apart the sidelined units (most of which fried the prime mover), the running locomotives are not in good health with daily problems mainly to engines, turbochargers, rheostatic braking and control circuits but also simpler things like fallen windscreens or smashed seats.
Hauled stock too has troubles, especially to the rolling parts and the braking system; the worst ones are the acid tankers that, being not so numerous, are intensely used.
Undoubtably the line is a challenge but better maintenance and a lowering of the hauled tonnage with more use of double heading (also because, at high quote engines loose power due to the oxigen rarefaction) could help very much.
But the father of problems is the scantiness of motive power, made worse by the prohibition of transit on the higher part of the line for many locos and the bad fame of the double-cabs as climbers. The two C40-8Ws are the most powerful but (apart the quick failure of 1033) couldn't be used where bigger is the need of heavy haul.
The company is not "poor", the main shareholders are big mining firms, and what is needed is an injection of locomotives, powerful and adapted to the tunnels reduced loading gauge. More, as Conrail is between the shareholders and should have good knowledge about locomotives, possibly a model less troubled than C39-8s, that yet in the USA were badly renowned for turbocharger problems.
The ideal would be wiring but this would imply the enlargement of the loading gauge, the improvement of some stretches and overall the acquisition of new traffic, also in the passengers field, but these are not priorities for the company that, apparently, sees other traffics as disturbs for the ore trains.
And here comes the fundamental question: who pays? The Peruvian state has the (bad) habit of making others pay for project and building of its great works in exchange of a long term concession and in eight years the FCCA thirty years one will expire; logically, without a secured future, the company is not interested in big improvements.
Last but not least, the operator don't build loyalty with the workers; instead pays lower than the average with the result of loose frequently trained personnel and generate vandalism by unhappy people.
In the end lights but also many shadows. It's correct that, at the end of the state management, the railroad was in a more than sorry state and, thanks to the concession, it could survive although regional and national governments put many obstacles but, after a first time of big expansion ("new" stock, acquisition of the cement plant as client, the metro-wanka project, the containers etc.), now the company seems only interested in fulfill with the current contracts.
Hope it has been an interesting reading. Remember that this is only my personal opinion.
As usual, for doubts or questions ask me.
Ciao
Alcohol is an enemy. Man that escapes from the enemy is a coward!