Railroad Forums 

  • CSX Track Upgrades & Infrastructure of Pan Am

  • Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.
Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

 #1631139  by CN9634
 
My understanding which is about as limited as they come at the moment is that they will seek to make a Rigby to NMJ job (and back) that is 3 sided, then run NMJ to Keag as a turn job (not sure frequency or number of crews involved).
 #1631163  by newpylong
 
The other thing to consider is that there is still a ton of 10 MPH running between Royal Junction and Waterville. I don't have any hard data (no more access to Temporary Speed Restrictions) but from the videos I have seen there is a lot of crap track still to be worked on before transit speeds can really come up.
 #1631169  by F74265A
 
The videos that i have seen this fall from rigby - waterville show many supplies dropped - cwr and pre fab switches - but not installed. Since winter is close at hand, i assume that will be next season’s work

Recent video from keag shows heavy new cwr with heavy new ballast and switches on the yard tracks but still light stick rail on the main track with an old light rail switch at the throat. Weird.
 #1631205  by jamoldover
 
For what it's worth, assuming an average speed of 20MPH start-stop on the 25 MPH sections of track (that includes acceleration and deceleration), Waterville-Keag is about a 6-1/2 hour trip each way, so a round trip inside of 12 hours isn't really possible. A Rigby-Waterville-NMJ trip would be about 7-8 hours one way (plus switching), so making that a one day up/one day back operation is reasonable, with a separate train making the 4-hour trip each way between NMJ and Keag.
 #1631212  by CN9634
 
If we call it a 135ish mile trip from Rigby to NMJ, that should be do-able in 9-10 hours... but you bring up a good point on switching at WTVL, you'd have to have your blocking done very efficiently on both ends. If NBSR is handed you soup, then you'll never make the run properly and end up dragging a bunch of stuff to Rigby to reblock. Then again, thats what they do now with some NMJ-Waterville traffic being pulled to Rigby to be re-switched to go back up to Waterville....if they're fine doing that then the block swapping will go easy but cycle times may suffer a bit.
 #1631644  by MEC407
 
From MaineDOT:
MaineDOT wrote:The Maine Department of Transportation and CSX are working to make safety improvements and improve track conditions at a railroad crossing on River Road in Benton and Clinton. This project will result in a safer crossing for vehicles. MaineDOT worked with CSX to secure Federal Highway Administration grant funding to help support these safety improvements.

This work will require the closure of River Road at the railroad crossing located north of Pleasant Drive in Benton from 7:00 a.m. on Saturday, October 21st until 5:00 a.m. on Monday, October 23rd. Vehicle traffic will be detoured over Route 100, Route 201, and Route 23.
 #1632069  by F74265A
 
Railpace claims emr/nbsr made csx put heavy rail in the keag yard as a condition to restart interchange bc they feared their heavy locomotives risked derailing
Also claims there is 3 miles of 85lb rail south of the yard to where replaced heavy rail starts in Winn
So odd that they would leave that short stretch of light rail
 #1632290  by neman2
 
Picture attached shows a new wayside signal enclosure installed recently at CP Graniteville. As can be seen conduit stub is covered with duct tape so installation is not complete. An identical setup is at CP Westford. Also "shark fin" antennas pointing east and west along the tracks on the original bungalow.
Graniteville CP 102923 A.jpg
Graniteville CP 102923 A.jpg (3.58 MiB) Viewed 1877 times
 #1632800  by newpylong
 
District 2 was cutover to the CSX dispatch system today. Since District 1 was already there that means the whole ex-PAR system is now on the CSX dispatching system.

B&E will happen as well at some point as CSX is responsible for supplying their software somehow.
  • 1
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 59