by BR&P
Fred, I'm not up to date on what is going on over there. But two questions come to mind regarding what you post:
1. What traffic would be moved that would warrant restoring rail service? Freight now moves over the former PRR which gets you from and to essentially the same end points. It would seem any new traffic which shows up could use the existing route rather than restoring what has been removed.
2. Why would the state be looking at restoring traffic, as opposed to an actual railroad - i.e. B&P?
Off the cuff I'd say it's fake news. If someone has information which suggests otherwise, I'll gladly reconsider my thinking..
1. What traffic would be moved that would warrant restoring rail service? Freight now moves over the former PRR which gets you from and to essentially the same end points. It would seem any new traffic which shows up could use the existing route rather than restoring what has been removed.
2. Why would the state be looking at restoring traffic, as opposed to an actual railroad - i.e. B&P?
Off the cuff I'd say it's fake news. If someone has information which suggests otherwise, I'll gladly reconsider my thinking..