by ApproachMedium
Jeff Smith wrote:ADMIN: We have a motion, it's been seconded, and I approve. No more discussion about the disposition of 601 until there is news.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Railroad Forums
Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman
Jeff Smith wrote:ADMIN: We have a motion, it's been seconded, and I approve. No more discussion about the disposition of 601 until there is news.
ApproachMedium wrote:946 Still in MARC service laid over this weekend in Baltimore. I noticed the back track where the 601 and a bunch of the AC motors were in Wilmington has been cleared out of all its engine and the 601. Stuff is probably getting ready for disposition.I'd dare say that this report from a reliable source around these parts certainly represents news and that the discussion regarding 601 may continue.
ThirdRail7 wrote:Odd. I don't recall seeing anything about picking up the 668 this week. I know that was the 29th was a PROJECTED date, but I never saw anything confirming a pickup.Mentioning that was nothing but a diversion from the obvious on my end.
I guess we'll find out soon enough.
gokeefe wrote:Although this thread has kept up well with deliveries I noticed there hasn't been that much lately in terms of general impressions of performance.I have spoken with many engineers about this. Some really seem to love the new engines, while others not so much. The majority though seems to like them.
Now that the engines have been on the property for some time and many of them have undergone comprehensive shakedowns I would be interested to know how they are doing.
Are the Sprinters performing well? Do they still have major operating problems (such as those described in early days of acceptance?)?
And perhaps the most controversial question of all .... Are they a suitable replacement for the AEM-7 (AC or DC)?
I ask the last question strictly in terms of performance, e.g. availability rate, and ability to pull/push trains in a variety of conditions (environmental, infrastructure, rolling stock).