by alewifebp
I read this news on Facebook earlier, and it is amazing news. The passenger volume that will be generated by this is going to be pretty incredible.
Railroad Forums
Moderator: Otto Vondrak
The Supreme Court ruled Monday the federal government has no claim to rights of way that railroads abandon after receiving them from Congress—a victory for property owners that could undermine plans for a nationwide network of recreational trails.I wonder what impact this will have on the plans of the County, if any?
DogBert wrote:Even through Kingston? When word of that decision spreads a lot of people that don't like railroads in their backyard are going to check into easements. There's nothing they can do to an active RR of course, but if CMRR is forced out - a whole can of worms could open. More legal expense for the county. it would of course be far smarter if they just went rail with trail... it may be their only way to actually get a complete trail.It won't matter, because the county isn't going to abandon the railroad. They're going to railbank it, in which case easements don't get extinguished (assuming there are any, of course).
map193 wrote:Can someone tell me, if everything is railbanked that passes through DEP property is there still an easement even though there is no longer a valid "railroad purpose?"That is my understanding. The "railroad purpose" is preserved even though the tracks are pulled up because the railroad can put tracks down any time it wants.