electricron wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 12:42 pm
At least he was using a scientific method to support his opinions, not just his whim like you.
Nah, I just lived in the DFW area for 14 years and worked in Houston for four... Having ties to both, I don't see the demand for 12 trains a day with 600+ seats each way. Big populations near each other doesn't necessarily equate into a good reason to try connecting them with 12 trains a day or spending tens of billions to do what hasn't existed since the 1960's.
But please, do keep talking about "scientific method" and data with zero context other than showing two cities in the same state.
Show me the context of why it's a good idea without saying or implying "people shouldn't drive their own car if other options exist" and perhaps also explain why it didn't happen over the last 50 years without saying the airlines fought it.
Here's my scientific data -- the terminal locations universally suck.
TCHSR "shopping mall site converted to a terminal" in Houston isn't near downtown or business districts... nor is it anywhere near the light rail network or the Amtrak station.
The terminal in Dallas is also not exactly ideal. It's planned for about a mile south on the other side of the convention center from the existing Amtrak station, although it might be close enough to the Blue/Red Line light rail to be moderately useful with a transfer at Reunion. Everyone loves three seat connections, right?
==============================================
Owner/operator of
TrainSim.com (the internet's largest train simulation community)