Hadn't been on the ground west of Elwyn for a decade; so I made a quick motor tour of the line one morning last week. I want to do it again, but some observations and very tentative conclusions are:
1. Track and overhead are intact, the former is good enough for the ballast trains from South Elwyn to Glen Riddle. No embankment repairs needed; catenary hangs limp through the station area, which is now effectively inaccessible by car. As a stop, it would have to depend on walk-ins from apartment houses which crowd the right of way. Could it generate the necessary 75 walk-in weekday boardings? I'm doubtful.
2. Looking west from the Pennell Road bridge, the catenary ends. Beyond that, a huge mound of ballast fill now carries a rebuilt single track roadbed and track. Old or new catenary bracket arms for single track extend westward. No catenary.
3. At Lenni, there's another rebuilt single track roadbed east and west of the traditional station area, which still retains its old lollypop sign at the Lenni Road crossing. Empty new catenary brack arm poles continue around the curve out of sight toward the SEPTA "Lenni Shop" sanctuary, a filled-in one time quarry. Didn't check that out (a SEPTA contractor's vehicle was buzzing around).
It would appear that at least 50 parking spaces could be placed on vacant land right around Lenni station, many more going toward the shop site. No potential-NIMBY homes within 100 yards or so. The track level is well above the Chester Creek at this point; no possible flooding. Although pathfinder signs would be needed, it's not hard to get off route 1 to the Lenni station site. Also, nearby Smith Bridge Road and Foulke Road go easily well back into the semi-suburban PA/DE hinterland for this station.
4. By contrast, the Wawa site is a poor one for a MAJOR station site, probably adopted because the line crosses route 1 on the map at this point (easy SEPTA route 111 JARC bus interchange). Unlike a decade ago, the area appears overgrown. The track is closer to creek level than at Lenni, and the ground to be used for parking is still lower (hence the costly garage?). An oxbow of the creek flows through this area, and that makes for more complexity and cost to build around.
So I'm beginning to think Lenni would be more suitable than Wawa as a TEMPORARY terminus, as someone earlier in this thread suggested. Most of the necessities are now in place since the line was reopened for the Amtrak ballast trains.
Also agree that the Octoraro Line needs to be safeguarded, at least as rail-with-trail. Yesterday at DVRPC, I saw an official map that designated it as "Octorara Trail" (sic).
John Pawson