by #5 - Dyre Ave
Salzman103 wrote:
"901 is the only bilevel opearating the MN. the rest of the MBTA equip on MN is all bomb cars as i have found out, and seen earlier today and tonight, more MBTA equip will be arriving this mornning at 3am to MN to replace NYCTA subway cars which were operating toinghts rushhour."
What?! First of all, I'm sure the FRA would bust a vein over seeing non-FRA-compliant NYC subway cars running on FRA-regulated Metro-North. Secondly, it is NOT possible for NYC subway cars to run on MN due to the different types of 3rd rail used - the subway uses over-riding 3rd rail (the power contact shoe runs on top of the rail) while MN uses under-riding 3rd rail (the shoe runs below the rail).
And if MBTA 901 is running on MN, where is it running? Certainly not out of Grand Central, whose tunnels can not accomodate bi-level cars.
"901 is the only bilevel opearating the MN. the rest of the MBTA equip on MN is all bomb cars as i have found out, and seen earlier today and tonight, more MBTA equip will be arriving this mornning at 3am to MN to replace NYCTA subway cars which were operating toinghts rushhour."
What?! First of all, I'm sure the FRA would bust a vein over seeing non-FRA-compliant NYC subway cars running on FRA-regulated Metro-North. Secondly, it is NOT possible for NYC subway cars to run on MN due to the different types of 3rd rail used - the subway uses over-riding 3rd rail (the power contact shoe runs on top of the rail) while MN uses under-riding 3rd rail (the shoe runs below the rail).
And if MBTA 901 is running on MN, where is it running? Certainly not out of Grand Central, whose tunnels can not accomodate bi-level cars.