• Rapid Transit DMU Lines for the MBTA - A Modest Proposal

  • Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.
Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: sery2831, CRail

  by idealurker
 
Hi Everyone! Long time lurker, first time poster. This forum has really helped me pursue my interest in MBTA operations, and for that I truly must thank all of you. I've been working on this post for a while, and my inspiraion to actually post it came from the recent post on upgrading the green line to heavy rail. Apologies in advance if it reads like it has been super-prepared (it has been), or if it recycles and incorporates ideas that have been posted on this forum before (it does). The basic idea is adding two new rapid transt DMU lines integrated into the MBTA along existing CR tracks, one serving northeast and northwest, and one serving west and southwest, connecting to all major subway lines outside downtown in order to facilitate "Urban Ring"-type transit. I'm looking for comments, suggestions, and questions...
Best to everyone,
JB

---

"A Commuter Rail Runs Through It"

Chelsea, Everett, Somerville, Dorchester, Allston, Brighton, Belmont, Waltham – all these communities, which are underserved by rapid transit, share one thing in common: Commuter Rail lines running through them. For some, like Everett, Allston, Brighton, and Somerville, the Commuter Rail makes no stops. For others, such as Dorchester, Belmont, and Chelsea, the Commuter Rail does indeed stop, although with its limited service, it is far from a true rapid transit option. Besides, these are not bedroom communities with commuters only seeking to arrive and depart North Station or South Station. These are inner suburbs, with inhabitants who live urban lives, and who therefore have a need for a flexible rapid transit option that connects them not only to the financial district, but to other rapid transit lines and other neighborhoods as well. With the MBTA’s radial spoke-and-wheel system, which limits all connections to a few stops downtown, this is a fact that is well-recognized, and has led to the planning stages of a so-called Urban Ring rapid transit line.

We will return to the concept of the Urban Ring later. For now, let us briefly explore the possibilities of introducing rapid transit onto Commuter Rail lines. FRA regulations prohibit light rail vehicles sharing track with freight and Commuter Rail trains, and yet Commuter Rail trains themselves, with their push and pull locomotives and their slow acceleration and deceleration, are particularly unsuited for stop-and-start rapid transit.

Enter DMUs – Diesel Multiple Units - trains in which each car has its own diesel engine, allowing the unit to easily make start-and-stop trips. Without any locomotive car, DMUs, which can be ADA-accessible, are very much akin to heavy rail or LRV subway cars, able to act much as the D-Riverside Green Line does, although able to share tracks with fright and Commuter Rail trains.

DMUs are at the center of many proposals for the “Indigo Line” – a rapid transit alternative to the long-neglected Fairmount Line of the Commuter Rail which runs through Dorchester, a densely populated neighborhood which is criminally underserved by rapid transit. There, Commuter Rail tracks need to be maintained, since they are the only alternative route into Boston from the southwest. They could, however, be serviced by DMUs fully integrated into the MBTA rapid transit system. As the cost of adding a new rapid transit line goes, the Indigo Line is a bargain: new rolling stock, and new and improved stations. No new tunnels, and a minimal investment in new track, if needed.

The MBTA and its Future Extensions

Image

This map illustrates the MBTA rapid transit lines, with two additions. First, the Green Line is extended north from Lechmere through Somerville to West Medford. This is an extension that is likely to occur, and is an important component of this proposal. New plans indicate a spur on this line into Union Square – an expensive addition. With this proposal, such a spur is unnecessary, and Union Square is serviced by a much more cost-efficient option.

The other change illustrated is the Blue Line extended north, possibly to Lynn. This extension is on these maps in order to show future possibilities, although it is not a necessary part of this proposal.

The Indigo Line, Writ Large

This proposal calls for two new DMU rapid transit lines integrated into the MBTA system, running on existing track shared with the Commuter Rail.

Image

As illustrated in MAP A, one line runs from Dorchester – the Indigo Line - to both South Station and, (since through-service through South Station is impossible) along a continuing track bypassing South Station and continuing along the Worcester Commuter Rail line which parallels the Massachusetts Turnpike. This section of the line begins in Newton – either Newton Corner or Newtonville, whichever allows the construction of an end-station most efficiently, and stops along the Commuter Rail tracks at Nonantum, where the tracks cross Brooks Street, North Brighton where the tracks cross Market Street, and Allston at the current site of the Sports Depot, where the tracks cross Franklin Street (the short extension of Harvard Ave after Cambridge Street). It will then stop at Boston University, at the BU Bridge, and then not far from Kenmore, where a pedestrian walkway will allow transfers to the Green Line (B, C, and D). It will then stop at Prudential, connecting to the E line, followed by Back Bay station, connecting to the Orange Line, and where the Commuter Rail will continue to stop. Before South Station, it can make one more stop near the New England Medical Center, at Tremont Street. The line will then split: one spur going to South Station, and the other one continuing along the aforementioned track through Dorchester.

Besides the relatively inexpensive cost of a completely new rapid transit line, benefits of the extended Indigo Line include:
a) Environmental justice for communities including Dorchester and Allston/Brighton, the latter of which used to have the A Line of the Green Line
b) Relieve congestion on the Green Line by providing an express alternative from Kenmore to the Back Bay and South Station
c) Relieve congestion at Park Street station by allowing an earlier connection from the Green Line (all lines) to South Station
d) Specifically relieve congestion on the B Line by providing an express service to BU and Allston
e) Expand possibilities for “Urban Ring”-like transit by connecting to all lines (except the Blue Line) outside the Financial District

The Yellow Line, especially its western section from Brandeis-Roberts to North Station, is conceived as a north-of-the-Charles version through Waltham, Belmont, Cambridge and Somerville of what the D-Riverside line is through Newton, Brookline, and the Longwood/Fenway neighborhood. Waltham, the furthest destination of the DMU lines, is a sensible endpoint. Not only is it a densely-populated city with few rapid transit options and a need for environmental justice, but, with its educational institutions and large I-95/Rt 128 employers, it is also currently one of the prime destinations for reverse-commuters on the Commuter Rail. Brandeis/Roberts, with its close proximity to I-95/Rt 128, leaves open the possibility of a Riverside-like parking garage and terminus for commuters adjacent to the circumferential highway. The line will service all current Commuter Rail stops, including Waltham Center, Waverly, Belmont, and Porter Square, and may make new, additional stops between these. The Commuter Rail may no longer need to stop at all stations, such as Waltham, Waverly and Belmont, thus increasing its speed for Fitchburg Line commuters. (It should, however, still stop at Brandeis-Roberts and Porter.) After Porter, it will stop just south of Union Square in Somerville, a station currently (and, according to this proposal, needlessly) envisioned as an expensive spur on the extended Green Line. It will then connect to the extended Green Line at Twin City Plaza, a stop not currently slated for the Green Line extension. After Twin City, the line will terminate at North Station.

On the eastern side, the line begins on Commuter Rail track near Wonderland, currently also the terminus of the Blue Line. It will serve the communities of Chelsea and Everett, and the current Commuter Rail stop at Chelsea can be eliminated, increasing the speed of the Commuter Rail journey. The line connects to the Orange Line at Sullivan Square, and also terminates at North Station. Since there can be no through-service through North Station, the line may, at peak or off-peak times, run trains directly from Wonderland to Waltham, on connecting track that avoids North Station.

Besides the relatively inexpensive cost of a completely new rapid transit line, the benefits of the Yellow Line include:
a) Environmental justice for communities of Chelsea, Everett, Somerville and Waltham. Everett in particular would have rapid transit service for the first time since the Orange Line “El” was closed in 1975.
b) Expand possibilities for “Urban Ring”-like transit by connecting to all northern lines outside of Boston
c) Maintain a direct link between the historically-connected cities of Somerville and Cambridge, which the Green Line extension alone would not maintain
d) Relieve congestion on the Red Line and at Park Street and Downtown Crossing by providing Cambridge residents with direct service to North Station as well as more generally an alternative route downtown
e) Relieve congestion of the Blue Line and at State and Government Center by providing Revere residents with direct service to North Station as well as the alternative route downtown

Expansion on Unused or Underutilized Track

The MBTA system can be further expanded not only by utilizing Commuter Rail lines for rapid transit, but also by using unused or underutilized track. MAP B suggests two potential expansion spurs along such track: first, a spur from the Yellow Line through the Fresh Pond/Mount Auburn area to Watertown (the tracks terminate at Arsenal, unless the tracks are extended a short distance to service Watertown Square), and a Green Line spur from the D-Riverside Line to Needham along a busy and congested corridor in Newton Upper Falls.

Image

These potential extensions are meant to highlight the potential for rapid transit along existing track, and are not as essential to the main proposal of running DMUs along existing major rail corridors.

A Nice Ring to It: The Harvard Connector

Of more direct value to the system itself would be a spur on the Indigo Line between BU and Allston to Harvard Square through North Allston, as illustrated in MAP C. Trains can then run along five different routes:

Newton-Harvard and vice versa
Newton-Dorchester and vice versa
Harvard-Dorchester and vice versa
Newton-South Station and vice versa
Dorchester-South Station and vice versa
Direct Indigo Line service between Harvard and South Station is also a possibility, although it would be redundant given the direct Red Line connection between the stations.

Image

Unlike the rest of the proposed Indigo and Yellow lines, the “Harvard Connector” on the Indigo Line would require new track, most likely a new tunnel, and a new Charles River crossing – an expensive undertaking, which in the post-“Big Dig” world of Massachusetts politics might seem impossible. However, there are several reason why this project in particular might be fiscally and logistically viable.

Harvard University – one of the country’s wealthiest private institutions – is expanding its core campus into North Allston through an ambitious building project. According to Harvard planners themselves, public transportation into the area is a major concern. Additionally, given Harvard’s emphasis on being a “good neighbor,” transportation in a revitalized North Allston is not just an issue for the university, but for residents as well.

Image

Fortunately, Harvard also owns all of the land from the Allston train yard, directly south of which is the Commuter Rail line, to the Charles River, including an industrial area between the train yard and Western Ave, which Harvard eyes for future expansion. Rail connections exist from the Commuter Rail track alongside the rail yard next to Cambridge Street into this industrial area. This connection is illustrated on the map below in pink, and an alternative entry into the industrial area is indicated in blue. The white triangle delineates the ideal location for a North Allston stop, and the pink circle pinpoints the location of the proposed Allston stop.

Image

The Indigo Line could therefore run on the surface from the Commuter Rail tracks all the way into North Allston. Alternatively, many of Harvard’s proposals for North Allston include new road connections, and a cut-and-cover tunnel under a new road might also be a possibility:

Image

This option is illustrated on the map below in orange:

Image

With regards to crossing the Charles, Harvard has envisioned several new crossing options, including tunnels to both the east and west of the current JFK Bridge. For a rail tunnel, it is essential that the tunnel be west of the bridge, since this would make a connection into Harvard Square far less expensive. An abandoned tunnel currently stretches from Harvard Square south to the JFK School of Government (on the west side of JFK Street) and this is the tunnel which can serve the Indigo Line into the Square, where passengers can connect to the Red Line.

While still an expensive proposition, the Harvard Connector would nonetheless have several important circumstances working in its favor. First, its construction would intersect with Harvard’s interests and even its future plans for construction in the area, meaning that Harvard may be convinced to provide a degree of funding to the project, not to mention land; second, the line can make use of existing track adjacent to the train yard bringing the rail line into North Allston; and third, linking the connector into Harvard Square can make use of existing abandoned tunnels north of the Charles. Compared to other proposed rail tunnel projects, therefore, this would not be the North-South rail link, or the Blue-Red Line connector.

It should be noted at this point that even without the Harvard Connector, the DMU lines would provide enough benefits – both in bringing service to underserved areas and in providing “Urban Ring”-like transit connections – to more than justify its relatively inexpensive cost.

The Harvard Connector would firmly enhance the Urban Ring properties of the DMU lines. Looking at MAP C, one can visualize its potential for engendering transfers outside of downtown. More specifically, it would:
a) Relieve congestion on the Green Line between Kenmore and Park, the Red Line between Park and Harvard, and Park Street station itself by creating an earlier connection to Harvard for all points west on the Green Line
b) Relieve congestion on the Route 66 bus by providing a direct connection between Harvard and North Allston and Allston/Brighton, as well as by providing a quicker connection to all points on the Orange Line including Roxbury Crossing, via Back Bay Station
c) Integrate the contiguous academic area stretching from BU to Harvard with the latter’s expansion southward
d) Integrate Harvard with both its Longwood medical campus, as well as the New England Medical Center
e) Ensure transportation options in a revitalized North Allston, and reconnect the Allston area, which has been fractured and divided since the Massachusetts Turnpike Extension

The Union Square Extension

While the Harvard Connector may, for reasons previously explained, be a feasible part of this larger DMU proposal, an extension to Union Square via Inman Square as illustrated in MAP D – while consummating the idea of the DMU lines as an Urban Ring – would probably be prohibitively expensive and generally infeasible. If completed, however, it would, raise the possibility of integrating the two DMU lines and effectively creating an Urban Ring transit line from Wonderland to Dorchester via Chelsea, Everett, Somerville, Cambridge, Allston, Kenmore, and the Back Bay/South End. If the expense of an Urban Ring rail line is to be undertaken anyway, this option should be considered as an alternative.

Image

Conclusion

DMUs along existing Commuter Rail lines is a feasible and inexpensive means of adding two new lines to Boston’s rapid transit system, thereby both bringing service to currently underserved communities, and facilitating “Urban-Ring” like transit connections outside of the Financial District. With the potentially feasible Harvard Connector, this latter property of the new lines can be more fully realized, and would provide very real benefits to the transit system overall, despite not being as complete as with the more costly Union Square connector.

  by ckb
 
Wow, lots to read and think about -- very thought provoking -- thanks!

I'm sure to have some more reactions, but my first is this one, and is more a question for those on this forum who know more about the details of the commuter rail operations.

Would increased usage of these lines greatly interfere with the existing commutter rail traffic? What kind of upgrades (besides station facilities and servicing facilities) would be needed? I'm thinking of interlockings, signaling systems, etc. If capacity is a problem, are there locations where new tracks could be added in the existing ROW? Whatabout "flyunders" in places like the Back Bay vicinity to help resolve potential cross-traffic problems?

My second reaction is that your proposal does a nice job to try to take advantage of existing infrastructure. Where you get adventerous, in the Harvard area of Allston, the logic is sound. But you miss one big market of the Urban Ring proposals, and that is the Longwood Medical area. Harvard runs a bus shuttle, plus the CT1 and CT2 serve this area, and it is a focal point of the Urban Ring studies. Anyone who can figure out how to tie this in will really have a winning plan ...

  by idealurker
 
Thanks, CKB, for your positive and helpful response!
Would increased usage of these lines greatly interfere with the existing commutter rail traffic? What kind of upgrades (besides station facilities and servicing facilities) would be needed? I'm thinking of interlockings, signaling systems, etc. If capacity is a problem, are there locations where new tracks could be added in the existing ROW? Whatabout "flyunders" in places like the Back Bay vicinity to help resolve potential cross-traffic problems?
It's definitely the technical details of how to manage increased traffic along these tracks that need the most thought, and beyond a few vague ideas, I lack the expertise to even brainstorm much. Do you have any specific things in mind?
one big market of the Urban Ring proposals, and that is the Longwood Medical area...
Good point. One thing though about the Urban Ring I've always thought is that it isn't about creating direct service between those types of locations that "need" them (eg. Harvard and LMA), but about making connections easier and earlier (i.e. before downtown). A connection into Kenmore makes more sense along this logic, since then transfers can be made to all destinations on the Green Line, including the LMA, without having to transfer at Park Street.

Note also current plans for the Urban Ring send it down Vassar Street through MIT, so still not directly connecting Harvard and the LMA (plus I think bringing the Urban Ring through MIT is a mistake... it's too close to downtown... the ring at Harvard seems to make more sense IMHO.)

Thoughts?

JB

  by trainhq
 
Well, let's see. The DMU stuff has been around a while, and there are good DMUs currently in operation. Colorado Railcar has one that is FRA compliant; another (very nice ) one is running down in New Jersey.
I think eventually the T will do some of this stuff. It will definitely happen on the Fairmount line, and once they've got that running, other commuter line neighborhoods are going to want it too. I'd say it'll happen on the Worcester line too, but would require reopening some long closed stations near Newton, which would require some $$$$, and (maybe) on the Fitchburg line. I don't see it happening in the Chelsea
area; there's not enough residential areas along the line
to justifiy it. With regard to the Harvard extension, forget it. The T is planning to run BRT down on the BU
rail bridge. Overall, however, it really depends on how well the Fairmount line works; if that succeeds, it'll get the other stuff going.

  by ckb
 
trainhq wrote:Colorado Railcar has one that is FRA compliant; another (very nice ) one is running down in New Jersey.
I'm guessing you're thinking of the RiverLINE in South Jersey, which is in operation. However, the cars used there are not FRA-compliant, they are more light rail like, and operate on a time-seperated agreement -- something that would definitely not be possible with this idea.
Overall, however, it really depends on how well the Fairmount line works; if that succeeds, it'll get the other stuff going.
Very true. If only the feds were more interested in hyping this kind of idea than in hyping BRT ....


... more on idea's comments later.
  by markffisch
 
One additional thought -- the yellow line that you propose to run out to Wonderland -- either as an addition or an alternative, consider running to Logan. There is a right of way running through Chelsea that then runs alongside of 1A. It currently ends at the park and ride lot but could actually be run into the airport. There is a bridge missing also. (Actually the bridge is still there. It appears that at one time it was a shared road and rail span. Probably not viable in this day and age.)

  by idealurker
 
TrainHQ - great point that the Fairmount line will be a good test, although it's dissapointing that it seems the MBTA still prefers to think about it as CR as opposed to real rapid transit, which it certainly could (and should) be. As to-
The T is planning to run BRT down on the BU rail bridge
I've heard the BU rail bridge being eyed for the urban ring and also for a new turnpike exit into Cambridge (mutually exclusive?) But I haven't heard BRT. Which proposal are you taking about?

markffisch wrote:
the yellow line that you propose to run out to Wonderland -- either as an addition or an alternative, consider running to Logan. There is a right of way running through Chelsea that then runs alongside of 1A. It currently ends at the park and ride lot but could actually be run into the airport.
I'd love to see that done. But do you think the area it runs through between Chelsea ad the airport is too non-residential to make this worthwhile? According to this proposal, residents of Chelsea, Everett, and Somerville etc would get a direct route to Wonderland, and thus a single connection to Logan (two connections if you count the shuttle bus.)
Also, is that an abandoned ROW? Is it in use? Great idea though!
JB

  by trainhq
 
You need more info on Urban Ring; the T can help you out. (or should). The Urban Ring proposal is BRT on from Route 16 to the BU bridge along the Cambridge rail line, then down to Longmont and over to Ruggles and JFK UMass. The long range plan is to turn this into Orange Line or light rail once some $$$ (more than 2 Billion of them!) can be found.

BRT is also proposed on the north side from Chelsea from route 16 over to the Airport, connecting with the existing airport Silver Line. It would also run along the Chelsea CR, and along the abandoned rail line from Chelsea to the airport.

I personally am not a huge BRT fan; however, I think most people agree that going to the airport, it makes sense just so you can get to all the terminals and go through the Ted Williams tunnel. It also makes sense to run it from Chelsea to the airport, just so it hooks
up with the existing Silver Line service, and allows you to get to South Boston from the North Shore without going through downtown. Most people agree that BRT from BU to Ruggles (mostly) through traffic (some dedicated ROW near Longmont) will be a mess, like
the current Washington street Silver Li(n)e is, but that's what they can afford now.

In reality, I don't think even the BRT portion of Urban Ring will be built any time soon. The problem with Urban Ring is that even though it would benefit everyone in Boston, it doesn't especially help any one community. There are too many other T projects (Green Line to Somerville, Blue Line to Lynn, various CR extensions) that have local transit-less constituencies clamoring for them. That's why I don't see it happening for another ten years, minimum.

  by gt7348b
 
Just for a point of information - using DMUs on the Fairmont Line and linking them up with a Yawkey (potentially extended to Riverside) shuttle is part of the Access Boston 2010 Transport Plan. Use the city's resources to lobby for it since the City through BTD already placed it in the official plan under D'Amato.

  by vanshnookenraggen
 
Superb ideas and great communication. Would you be interested in having me host this on my site? I'll give you full credit of course.

  by idealurker
 
Vanshnookenraggen - I'm a big fan of your site, and a "Future MBTA Addict" - so having you host this on your site would be a tremendous honor!
I'll e-mail you over the coming days about it. :-D :P
JB

  by SbooX
 
Yikes, and I thought my post was long! :wink:

Seriously though, some good ideas in here. I fully support the Indigo Line to Fairmount as has been discussed here and elsewhere extensively. I also like the idea of a line to Allston/Brighton, but I think the Readville line needs priority. One problem I have is your idea to run trains between the two lines, but bypassing South Station. This would leave Back Bay as the only downtown stop (and even thats stretching it a bit) and would eliminate a direct Red Line connection.

The western section of your Yellow Line would work pretty well IMO, but the eastern might not work as well. As someone else pointed out the rail line in Chelsea does not go through many heavily populated areas (which leads to the low boardings at the existing CR station). Chelsea desperatly needs better transit though. One idea I had was to run light rail (it was a green line spur until I decided it needed to be heavy rail :wink: ) down the Revere Beach Parkway (in a reservation) to Beachmont.

I also like the Watertown line idea, and as a former Inman Sq. resident I would love to see service to there (and Union) via Harvard. Not sure how feasible it would be though.

  by idealurker
 
One problem I have is your idea to run trains between the two lines, but bypassing South Station. This would leave Back Bay as the only downtown stop (and even thats stretching it a bit) and would eliminate a direct Red Line connection.
Sort of.... trains from Dorchester would have two routes with two different destinations (ignoring the Harvard extension for the moment): one route would go to and terminate at South Station, and the other route would bypass South Station continuing onwards through Back Bay and Kenmore to Allston. The way the tracks come into South Station seems to preculde through-service between the two lines via South Station itself.
Anyway, even on trains that bypass South Station, a connection to the Red Line could be created at Broadway (as shown ont he maps).
...As someone else pointed out the rail line in Chelsea does not go through many heavily populated areas (which leads to the low boardings at the existing CR station).
Chicken and egg... maybe CR is just plainly the wrong type of service for the area, but if it were effective rapid transit, a line through that corridor would in fact work....
...as a former Inman Sq. resident I would love to see service to there (and Union) via Harvard. Not sure how feasible it would be though.
Definitely tricky. How was the Red Line extension constructed north of Harvard? Any lessons there?

  by SbooX
 
idealurker wrote:Anyway, even on trains that bypass South Station, a connection to the Red Line could be created at Broadway (as shown ont he maps).
Hmmmm... interesting I didn't notice that. Approximately how far away is the CR line from Broadway?

Another thought I just had was that maybe you could run through service at south station... sorta. Have a Fairmount train stop at South Station, then simply have it head for Alston. Turn around times should be fairly quick for DMU's.

  by ceo
 
idealurker wrote: Definitely tricky. How was the Red Line extension constructed north of Harvard? Any lessons there?
Deep-bore tunnelling under Mass. Ave. North Cambridge being a well-to-do part of town, cut-and-cover would have been expensive in more than just financial terms. :-) (Plus, they had to go deep-bore from Porter to Davis anyway, as the alignment didn't match the street grid.)