by STR R-40
Does anyone know when the R-40 slant ends will be retired, and if any will be saved?
Railroad Forums
Moderator: GirlOnTheTrain
STR R-40 wrote:Does anyone know when the R-40 slant ends will be retired, and if any will be saved?I don't think the date has been announced, besides delivery on the R160's haven't even started. Then, once the first sets of R160's arrive they have to be road tested for at least 6 months before the rest of the delivery can commence. We are probably looking at a couple of years before the equipment can be retired.
BMT wrote:The R44/46 group of cars will be replaced by the R-160s before anything else goes. Reason being is that those are the 75' cars which as most everyone already knows are a pain for NYCT since they are restricted to IND (B2) territory on the system because of their length. The R-143 (and their future counterparts, the R160) are a return to 60' cars that will clear everywhere in the B Division.R44s yes, but R46s I doubt. I've heard some much about what the R160s will replace, but I personally find it hard to believe the Slants and the R38s will be around too much long, and I doubt the R32s will be going anywhere for now.
The R-32 and R-38's will be arround for a while still as they are in decent to good condition (pending completion of the floor replacements).Hmm, I wonder what that tells you about the quality of things through the years. Although quality seems to be more important today than it was 30 years ago, so at least we're on a rebound.
arrow wrote:I think it's more like "you can't beat the laws of science". The metal makeup of the R32s and R38s has held together better than the metal makeup of the R40s, R40Ms, and R42s so the R32s and R38s will last longer.The R-32 and R-38's will be arround for a while still as they are in decent to good condition (pending completion of the floor replacements).Hmm, I wonder what that tells you about the quality of things through the years. Although quality seems to be more important today than it was 30 years ago, so at least we're on a rebound.
arrow wrote:You are proving my point. No matter what the difference is, things were built better back then.I didn't prove your point. I actually provided support for my claim based on fact, you didn't. My point is based on fact, yours is based on opinion.