BvaleShihTzu wrote:leviramsey wrote:eustis22 wrote:Personally, the proposed Haverhill changes still suck.
Until such time as Haverhill is mostly double tracked, just about any schedule change which improves service on the other Northside lines will damage Haverhill schedules.
Why can the T run roughly half-hourly service during part of the rush hour but not other parts? Half hourly is really the minimal acceptable frequency during rush hour.
As mentioned, the limited double-track (in this case, it's the Haverhill end, as opposed to the evening, when it's the limited double tracking alongside the Orange Line that's the problem) combined with the limited layover space in Bradford limits the number of trains you can run at headways shorter than the infrastructure's base headway.
It takes about 35 minutes to go from Haverhill to Wilmington double-track (via the Wildcat) and about the same to get to Reading double-track. That gives a base headway (what you can run without dipping into the layover sets) of 85 minutes (with padding that depends on there not being much ridership on one of the inbound or the outbound). 4 layover sets in Bradford then means that you can't have more than 4 inbounds a day departing sooner than 1:25 after the previous inbound (barring a run of 5 outbounds before an inbound, in which case, those outbounds replenish the layover; however, since similar constraints affect the other end, though this just creates a really long outbound service gap). The line's infrastructure imposes a hard cap of 2 hours a day where you can have 30 minute headways inbound, with every other period of 30 minute headways requiring a couple of hours of no outbound service. If you're willing to settle for a consistent 45 minute headway, you can get something like this for Haverhill AM departures:
5:10
5:55
6:40
7:25
8:10
9:35
As to why it doesn't get fixed quickly: there's only so much money, and, being a political organization, the allocation of those funds is largely a question of political capital and the willingness to spend it. In comparison to the Fitchburg line enhancements, the state legislators along that line are willing to prod the T into directing funds to that line. Why is that so? Because there are enough voters who want a better Fitchburg line, largely because there's no good way, especially no good toll-free way, into Boston, especially once Alewife has filled up for the day. That's not the case with the Haverhill line: it's the only line that's paralleled by Interstate standard "free" highway from endpoint to endpoint. For the Eastern Route, driving basically means Route 1 between 128 and the Tobin. For Lowell, it means 128 to 93. For Fitchburg (once Alewife is full), it's Cambridge urban streets, 128 to 93 or 128 to the Pike. For Worcester, it's the Pike. For Needham, it's city streets or 128 to the Pike. For Providence, it's 128 to 93. For the Old Colony, it's 93, but you're looking at either 24 or 3 to get there. Not enough commuters in Northern Essex County use the Haverhill Line (partly because its infrastructure is so woeful) to make their elected representatives poke the T into action. It's a vicious cycle, and it's basically taken the Downeaster to create momentum to get the feds to give the T money to do what's being done now.
The presence of 93 also means that it's reasonable to expect that even in a large-scale transition away from automobiles, the communities along the Haverhill Line are going to be among the last holdouts in that transition (and indeed, could even attract the pro-car partisans who hold up the 60s and 70s as an ideal). All of this means that the Haverhill Line is more of a coverage service than a ridership service (to borrow Jarrett Walker's terminology): the amount of money required to increase ridership means foregoing a larger ridership increase on, e.g. the Lowell Line and it's thus not a good idea if you want a transit system that makes a difference for maximal people to spend money improving the Haverhill Line until the other lines are fixed up (but if someone else can be convinced to pay for it, then the work will get done).