by ThirdRail7
Start keeping an eye on the schedules. A change or two will likely appear in the near future.
I want my road foreman!
Railroad Forums
Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman
ThirdRail7 wrote:Start keeping an eye on the schedules. A change or two will likely appear in the near future.Will do!
ThirdRail7 wrote:In a few weeks, trains 181 and 198 will no longer operate. Trains 89 and 90 will operate in their place over the NEC, carrying local travel in a few extra cars that will cut and turn in WTC.Wow, WTC? Did you mean to type WAS? You say WTC to me and the New Yorker in me thinks World Trade Center.
hi55us wrote:I read WTC as Washington Terminal Company = WAS Union Station's historical owner/operatorThirdRail7 wrote:In a few weeks, trains 181 and 198 will no longer operate. Trains 89 and 90 will operate in their place over the NEC, carrying local travel in a few extra cars that will cut and turn in WTC.Wow, WTC? Did you mean to type WAS? You say WTC to me and the New Yorker in me thinks World Trade Center.
This always puzzled me why they don't merge more southbound NEC trains with LD Trains.
west point wrote:Reasons not to do this ?21. Isn't something to worry about if you actually cancel the train being stolen from and steal its coaches.
21. Steals passengers from NEC stats and revenue. Note: sometimes been done at Thanksgiving..
22. Spoils some passengers who get to use diner
dowlingm wrote:In theory, would a similar operation with Vermonter or the Springfield Regionals work on the other side of Penn to NHV - either terminating there or having the electric/Amfleets continue east?