efin98 wrote:I don't know what I am talking about? I live in the vicinity! Have lived here my entire 22 years and three months. I know what the heck I am talking about.
So? You come off as the T's lapdog, complete with misappropiated priorities.
efin98 wrote:You know why it keeps rising in cost? Because people who think they know what is good for everyone else despite not living in the affected areas keep telling the "experts" and the legislature and the MBTA that one project is good then go around the next minute and demand that another project come first. Stalling for time, sputtering around when it comes time to put up or shut up, lawsuits galore despite having no legal basis- those are what's driving up the costs.
Wrong. It's due to cost overruns. You know, something that happens in the last minute that delays construction, or lawsuits by people who live near the line, but don't want it, due to the adverse effect that it will have on them? The lawsuits you are referring to are from people, the people whom you self-righteously brand as being outsiders who don't live in the disputed area, who are fed up with the T stalling on their commitments. The cost of their lawsuits have almost nothing to do with the fluctuating estimated cost of a given commuter rail project. So, are STEP, and the Arborway Committee just groups run by people who don't live in their respective areas?
efin98 wrote:And the bottom line remains constant: service down there is needed. That's the one fact that can't be argued or ignored.
It will have to come eventually. But, the city, and surrounding areas, have to be taken care of first. For future reference: Cities first, suburbs second.
efin98 wrote:A load of utter crap. Proven wrong by the DEP when the extention goes up for review. Laying dormant does more damage than actually building the extention.
Is the Hockomock Swamp somehow dispensable? The enviromental impact can be lessened by building around it, but the T could care less. And, lying dormant dosen't emit diesel fumes.
efin98 wrote:Sullivan Square. Literally just feet across the border in Charlestown where a good percentage of the buses that serve Somerville go. But don't let that little fact get in the way of ranting your case.
Is it within Somerville's borders? No. The fact that it's not within Somerville's borders is why I didn't mention it. Pithy enough?
efin98 wrote:Get it right. I said what is needed most. I never said isn't needed. If you are going to quote me don't put words in my mouth. There are ALOT MORE people who want the Fall River/New Bedford and Blue Line extentions than there are who want the Green Line extention, about 100,000 more by last count according to population affected.
Did you conveniently leave out the percentage of people that would support a given project? Half of the communities along the proposed Fall River/New Bedford route are opposed to it, while the Somerville extension enjoys citywide support. The Blue Line extension is popular as well, and should be done too, alongside with the Somerville extension. And, one more thing, seven times as many people pass through Somerville on a daily basis than the number of people who want the Fall River/New Bedford rail line, and the Blue Line extension.
efin98 wrote:Are you aware of the traffic congestion, terrible air quality, and lack of service in Chelsea, Revere, Lynn, Salem, Swampscott, Fall River, New Bedford, Easton, Taunton????
Somerville is closest to downtown Boston than all of those municipalities you mentioned, yet it has poor coverage. Also, the Somerville Green Line extension is a Big Dig mitigation requirement, and is long overdue. Somerville is the fifth-densest city in the entire US, and its residents are more likely to die from lung cancer, and heart attacks, than anywhere else in Massachusetts. In addition, Somerville ranks second in exposure to pollution, and first in lack of open space in the entire state.
One more thing: Chelsea, Lynn, and Swampscott all have commuter rail stops. So much for lack of service.
efin98 wrote:Not likely. Not with more votes in Lynn, Fall River, New Bedford, Chelsea, Revere, Winthrop all holding more sway and the key positions in the legislature to deny that from happening. Not with actual support from the Governor. Not with money and studies actually conducted and under review. Those projects are miles and years ahead of the Green Line extention, but why let the facts get in the way of your dellusions??
Delusions my freaking foot. Does it matter what political influence most of those towns have, when the Somerville Green Line has to be built within six years by the state of Massachusetts, according to the Big Dig mitigation agreement? However, I would rank the Blue Line extension to Lynn second to Somerville, for that is a Big Dig requirement as well.
http://www.badtransit.com/twatch_more.p ... 24_0_2_0_C
http://www.badtransit.com/twatch_more.p ... 21_0_2_0_C
http://www.somervillestep.org/background/