by atlantis
My question was sarcastic about the rehab. CapeRail may be actually doing the physical work (I'm sure subcontracted out), but we the taxpayers will be paying for it as the line is owned by the state.
I would not object necessarily to that IF the state supports some kind of "real" passenger rail Cape Cod.
Granted, the line in question may not be slated for passenger service, but as a whole, tax funded rail track improvements need not be objectionable as long as some kind of passenger rail (useful to the people, that is!) is supported.
However, knowing the way that "progressive" Massachusetts operates, we are in for a long fight. But that's where the people come in. "wink"
I certainly would rather see my tax dollars be applied to something that benefits the public-at-large, rather than being used to build a stadium for rich proffessional sports teams. But that's only my opinion, as flawed as it may be.
(emoticons can not be displayed by my computer)
I would not object necessarily to that IF the state supports some kind of "real" passenger rail Cape Cod.
Granted, the line in question may not be slated for passenger service, but as a whole, tax funded rail track improvements need not be objectionable as long as some kind of passenger rail (useful to the people, that is!) is supported.
However, knowing the way that "progressive" Massachusetts operates, we are in for a long fight. But that's where the people come in. "wink"
I certainly would rather see my tax dollars be applied to something that benefits the public-at-large, rather than being used to build a stadium for rich proffessional sports teams. But that's only my opinion, as flawed as it may be.
(emoticons can not be displayed by my computer)
If Boston to Cape Cod rail service occurs in 2012 I will eat a jelly doughnut dipped in tomato sauce.