by 56andahalf
With fares set to increase on LIRR and Metro-North yet again next month, such that it will now cost $7.25 to travel from Penn Station to Jamaica (a distance of 10 miles), I think the time has come for the MTA to take a harder look at how it spends its money.
The overwhelming majority of LIRR’s expenses are for rank-and-file labor. And that’s the way I would expect it to be. Even with technology that becomes more advanced with each passing day, the railroad can’t function without lots of actual human beings coming to work every morning (or afternoon, or night.) And these people need to be paid.
But, I think we need to consider the possibility that LIRR may be spending too much on train service employees. Whenever someone has mentioned this possibility in railfan circles, the standard response has always been: “Well, the conductor’s in charge of the train!”. Fine, but what does being “in charge of the train” in 2008 actually entail? It definitely doesn’t involve making sure the correct cars get dropped at the correct sidings or walking a mile-long consist to repair a brake hose or a 70-pound knuckle, as a freight conductor is required to do. As far as I can tell, here are the duties that a LIRR conductor performs every day:
1) Punching tickets
2) Occasionally selling tickets
3) Opening and closing the doors
4) Assisting the engineer with the brake test by watching needles on a dial
5) Am I missing something?
The same way you wouldn’t pay $12 for a gallon of milk at the supermarket, it seems like a waste of money for the MTA’s railroads to be paying $32 per hour, plus healthcare, plus a generous pension, to people who spend nearly all of their day punching holes in paper.
The thing is, I think most of you realize this. Considering how angry this board gets when anyone asks what the hourly wage rates for train service positions are, I think most of you privately realize that the rates are unreasonably high, which is why so many members of this board fight to keep them a secret.
Comments?
The overwhelming majority of LIRR’s expenses are for rank-and-file labor. And that’s the way I would expect it to be. Even with technology that becomes more advanced with each passing day, the railroad can’t function without lots of actual human beings coming to work every morning (or afternoon, or night.) And these people need to be paid.
But, I think we need to consider the possibility that LIRR may be spending too much on train service employees. Whenever someone has mentioned this possibility in railfan circles, the standard response has always been: “Well, the conductor’s in charge of the train!”. Fine, but what does being “in charge of the train” in 2008 actually entail? It definitely doesn’t involve making sure the correct cars get dropped at the correct sidings or walking a mile-long consist to repair a brake hose or a 70-pound knuckle, as a freight conductor is required to do. As far as I can tell, here are the duties that a LIRR conductor performs every day:
1) Punching tickets
2) Occasionally selling tickets
3) Opening and closing the doors
4) Assisting the engineer with the brake test by watching needles on a dial
5) Am I missing something?
The same way you wouldn’t pay $12 for a gallon of milk at the supermarket, it seems like a waste of money for the MTA’s railroads to be paying $32 per hour, plus healthcare, plus a generous pension, to people who spend nearly all of their day punching holes in paper.
The thing is, I think most of you realize this. Considering how angry this board gets when anyone asks what the hourly wage rates for train service positions are, I think most of you privately realize that the rates are unreasonably high, which is why so many members of this board fight to keep them a secret.
Comments?