by rrfoose
Despite the many criticisms of Guilford in their current state, just how profitable could they be under different management? I hear the rumors about how much business they've shrugged off, and how poorly maintained their facilities are. I'm not from New England, nor have I ever been there to see Guilford operate - I only know what I read from railfans. But despite a supposedly dieing rail industry, I would think Guilford should be raking in the money - if it were managed effectively (like P&W?). They have access to some of the largest markets, and the one of the few western gateways. I know why they got rid of D&H, but I see that as a big mistake nowadays. It simply slows their shipments and doesn't give them the competitive edge with NS/CP that single-line CSX has into New England.
Of course this is speculation, but had they kept D&H and not driven away all the business, they could of had enough money to buy the Southern Tier during the Conrail split - it's really an outcast line that NS and CSX could have done without, but it would have substantially helped a railroad such as Guilford. It just seems to me that despite MEC and B&M's struggles in the 1970s, a combined system today (post Staggers Act) should be highly competitive and profitable.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
Of course this is speculation, but had they kept D&H and not driven away all the business, they could of had enough money to buy the Southern Tier during the Conrail split - it's really an outcast line that NS and CSX could have done without, but it would have substantially helped a railroad such as Guilford. It just seems to me that despite MEC and B&M's struggles in the 1970s, a combined system today (post Staggers Act) should be highly competitive and profitable.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?