by octr202
Trinnau wrote:Thanks, though not retirement - just a job change to the suburbs (and driving 128). Hopefully I'll still get to go for the occasional trip into the city to see what comes of all of this.
Congrats on retirement! But it sounds like they're waiting for the upcoming Merrimack River Bridge shutdowns starting in September to proceed with this signal work.
I know I made a joke before on here about hoping I see the project done before I retire, but that's a really long way off!
At least finishing Vale-LJ now sounds a bit more simple if there is no crossover to track 1 (i.e., PAR Lowell branch only accessed via track 2). Still have to deal with the station though. Will there be an opposite counterpart to Vale west of LJ which would allow the new track 1 to function as a long passing track prior to closing the Vale-LJ gap and dealing with the Ballardvale station?
One thing I always wondered was why Vale wasn't located closer to Ballardvale, although maybe there's more curvature in there working east from the station than there appears to the untrained eye.
Also guessing that WB freights will have to be held somewhere short of Vale if they're waiting for passenger moves to clear before getting onto the Lowell branch, as there's less than 2500' of track between Vale and the cemetery crossing. Maybe that'll be good for railfans - lots of room east of the Andover station for them to hold there, and maybe fewer complaints at least until the DPW yard gets turned into condos or apartments!
Wondering if I'll see the Western Route double-tracking finished before I retire...
Photo: Melbourne W7 No. 1019 on Route 78, Bridge & Church Streets, Richmond, Victoria. 10/21/2010
Photo: Melbourne W7 No. 1019 on Route 78, Bridge & Church Streets, Richmond, Victoria. 10/21/2010