If the state rebuilt track to accommodate every proposed forest product manufacturer that never came to fruition it would be bankrupt. Even if that facility was built I think there was some serious doubt as to how much if any they would use rail. Why not wait until they at least break ground before starting the rebuild vs going on pure speculation? This wasn't some drop in the bucket expenditure but more like several million dollars we're talking about here.
BandA wrote:I thought ties lasted about 40 years?That's the correct number if you're talking about active rail use. Brand new ties with nothing running over them? Completely different question.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk