by eustis22
>They don't operate any trains east of Haverhill--at least not yet.
And never will, as long as Plaistow has a say.
And never will, as long as Plaistow has a say.
Railroad Forums
Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman
RenegadeMonster wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 11:04 am Why wouldn't they want MBTA?I'm on my phone so I won't go on, but I think the shortest answer is that there is a relevant leverage of residents who live in New Hampshire because they DON'T want closer ties to Massachusetts and Boston.
markhb wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 11:53 amIt's more, I think, that they don't want to pay for MBTA service. As far as I know there is zero support anywhere in NH to pay for rail service of any kind.RenegadeMonster wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 11:04 am Why wouldn't they want MBTA?I'm on my phone so I won't go on, but I think the shortest answer is that there is a relevant leverage of residents who live in New Hampshire because they DON'T want closer ties to Massachusetts and Boston.
gokeefe wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:43 pm That's not true anymore. Reliable public polls indicate strong majority (70%+) support for passenger rail service expansion on New Hampshire. Policy change is underway at the legislative level.The only reliable poll is a referendum. 2016 proved public opinion polls are fixed.
electricron wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:53 pm The only reliable poll is a referendum. 2016 proved public opinion polls are fixed.And New Hampshire doesn't have statewide ballot initiatives so all roads go through the legislature.