Railroad Forums
Moderators: sery2831, CRail
bierhere wrote:All of this information should be on the MBTA website. They are a contractor. There name should never appear on anything, period!Is their contract up for renewal soon?
bierhere wrote:All of this information should be on the MBTA website. They are a contractor. There name should never appear on anything, period!Well, the MBTA doesn't hesitate to blame MBCR publicly when convenient, so I don't have a problem with this contractor having a higher than usual profile.
RailBus63 wrote:I would agree that contractor gets a lot of blame for lousy/old equipment. But, the contractor is the one who signed up for the contract to maintain it and to meet the 90% on-time number. In addition, the contractor got a 10% raise between 2008/2009, ( during a no-bid contract extension ). This contract should have gone out to bid, instead MBCR got a huge increase.bierhere wrote:All of this information should be on the MBTA website. They are a contractor. There name should never appear on anything, period!Well, the MBTA doesn't hesitate to blame MBCR publicly when convenient, so I don't have a problem with this contractor having a higher than usual profile.