metraRI wrote:The biggest area of improvement that I see is with the early outbound rush... instead of there being a 2:55, 3:45, 4:10... add another train so it looks more like 2:25, 3:05, 3:40, 4:10, then the addition of another inbound express. A change like that could probably be done without adding more sets to the Rock.
The number of sets definately doesn't seem to be a problem, but some of the scheduling is just... weird, and it seems a little inefficient.
Is there any reasoning for the all of the little time differences after the PM rush? A lot of the other lines run hourly outbounds. But on the RI, it changes from 6:40 and 7:40 to 8:45 and 9:45 to 10:55 (now 11:05) and finally 12:30. MD-N is kind of the same way. It's not like it's a problem, it just seems weird, and I missed an outbound once because of it.
And yeah, the early PM rush is pretty odd. What I hate the most is the hour and a half gap between Joliet-bound trains, since 603 is a Beverly. I guess you could just transfer to 405 at Blue Island, but it seems stupid since they both get there at about the same time anyway. But on a daily basis, there's always a large amount of people waiting on 405.
And a little more variety would be nice between 413, 415, and 417. The RI runs that 3:40 departure before holidays that goes direct to Oak Park Avenue. Why not send either 413, 415, or 417 direct to Tinley and then have one that serves 95th, 103rd, Robbins, Midlothian, Oak Forest, and maybe two or three stops after that? BNSF does that with their 5:22/5:26/5:32 departures, in which the stops are all staggered. Granted, they have a third track to use, but it wouldn't be impossible on the RI.
Same thing on the morning inbound side. Why not send some runs express after 80th or Oak Park and have some skip Hickory Creek and 80th? Some of those AM inbounds are so packed by the time that they get to Midlothian that few people boarding at that point can find a seat.