by MACTRAXX
Everyone:
As a long time visitor to this topic I have noticed the debate about changing the Atlantic City Rail Line from an AC
commuter line to one that primarily serves Philadelphia instead because of AC's struggling economy.
Jason Laughlin at the Philadelphia Inquirer asks this question and adds an opinion about serving directly University
City and the Philadelphia International Airport. This was mentioned in a South Jersey opinion blog recently.
That author is Joseph Russell of Collingswood.
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/in-t ... hilly.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://southjerseyist.wordpress.com/20 ... city-line/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This writer does not know about or understand the physical constraints of changing the NJT Atlantic City Line route
to serve either University City or PHL - and suggests added station stops at Woodcrest and points in between to the
Cherry Hill Station - that alone will be redundant with PATCO there or nearby. Right now there is no physical direct
connection between 30th Street Station's lower level and SEPTA's University City Station - to serve UC a train would
have to reverse direction at 30th Street Upper Level and then operate to UC. There is an intact unused tunnel that
would allow trains to bypass 30th Street Upper Level and go straight down to UC and then PHL (visible from SEPTA
trains using tracks 5/6 between UC and 30th) which would need to have tracks relaid into it and switches installed
to make this option useable-bypassing 30th Street Upper Level in the process.
In short none of these options are practical without operational problems and what is currently there is sufficient.
Running a Philadelphia-oriented instead of AC service may be a good change that could benefit more commuters.
Anybody have any opinions? MACTRAXX
P.S. This should be linked into the SEPTA/PATCO Forum for more visibility...
As a long time visitor to this topic I have noticed the debate about changing the Atlantic City Rail Line from an AC
commuter line to one that primarily serves Philadelphia instead because of AC's struggling economy.
Jason Laughlin at the Philadelphia Inquirer asks this question and adds an opinion about serving directly University
City and the Philadelphia International Airport. This was mentioned in a South Jersey opinion blog recently.
That author is Joseph Russell of Collingswood.
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/in-t ... hilly.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://southjerseyist.wordpress.com/20 ... city-line/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This writer does not know about or understand the physical constraints of changing the NJT Atlantic City Line route
to serve either University City or PHL - and suggests added station stops at Woodcrest and points in between to the
Cherry Hill Station - that alone will be redundant with PATCO there or nearby. Right now there is no physical direct
connection between 30th Street Station's lower level and SEPTA's University City Station - to serve UC a train would
have to reverse direction at 30th Street Upper Level and then operate to UC. There is an intact unused tunnel that
would allow trains to bypass 30th Street Upper Level and go straight down to UC and then PHL (visible from SEPTA
trains using tracks 5/6 between UC and 30th) which would need to have tracks relaid into it and switches installed
to make this option useable-bypassing 30th Street Upper Level in the process.
In short none of these options are practical without operational problems and what is currently there is sufficient.
Running a Philadelphia-oriented instead of AC service may be a good change that could benefit more commuters.
Anybody have any opinions? MACTRAXX
P.S. This should be linked into the SEPTA/PATCO Forum for more visibility...
EXPRESS TRAIN TO NEW YORK PENN STATION-NO JAMAICA ON THIS TRAIN-PLEASE STAND CLEAR OF THE CLOSING TRAIN DOORS