BandA wrote:would be nice to see a long-term plan to convert from the 25 cycles to 60, say in the next 50 years. Are they going to wire the two new tunnels under the Hudson with 25Hz?
Probably. But the wire hardware doesn't differ with the frequency so long as the voltage stays the same. If it's anything like when Metro North went from 25 Hz to 60 Hz on the New Haven Line + Hell Gate back in '84 it's a circuit-breaker changeout done phase break by phase break with no downtime except maybe night/weekend outages when they're doing the actual power change. The signal system runs at 100 Hz (low voltage) so the return current in the running rails and the track circuits aren't in conflict. Signal hardware is no different under 25 Hz AC, either 60 Hz AC voltage, or 750V DC third rail.
The only way the tunnels in/out of NYP will be changed to 60 Hz on any timetable less than deep- deep- long-term is if mythical Secaucus Loop gets built to drag LIRR and MNRR trains into Jersey. LIRR would be able to use its dual-mode locos because the North River Tunnels have (currently Sandy-damaged and turned off, but eventually repairable) 3rd rail, and LIRR's next MLV coach order will be able to fit through those tubes where their current C3's can't. They would just switch back to diesel mode at the tunnel portal. However, the only way you're getting future Penn Station Access trains on the New Haven Line into Jersey is either: A) laying another few miles of 3rd rail with couple more very expensive DC substations, or B) moving the 60/25 phase break to the other side of the river. The latter would be a hell of a lot cheaper, but there's that whole thorny jurisdictional issue of who's going to pay for a New York/Connecticut-operated commuter rail project that primarily benefits New Jersey (hence the "mythical" tag). So don't hold your breath on anyone at an executive level weighing those electrical pros/cons anytime soon.