by waldwickrailfan
In service and hooked up to the 4110. I saw it yesterday on 66 and 57. It has a slightly different horn than the others
Railroad Forums
Moderators: lensovet, Kaback9, nick11a
waldwickrailfan wrote:In service and hooked up to the 4110. I saw it yesterday on 66 and 57. It has a slightly different horn than the othersCame down to Hoboken on train 48 this morning and could not make the turn to train 43. Not sure what the issue was.
steemtrayn wrote:I hear that 4908 has to go back...Bearings were installed wrong and the crankshaft is shot.It was from awhile ago but still.
beanbag wrote:Oy.. Another MN rebuild junker.. Didn't one of the other F40s have something up with the bearings and crankshaft?Not an F40, but rather the 4906 suffered a major failure within days of its return to service upon returning from rebuilding/overhaul. It required extensive repair and was OOS for several months.
Sirsonic wrote:Thats interesting, thanks for the info Sirsonic. I didnt know it had such a massive failure..beanbag wrote:Oy.. Another MN rebuild junker.. Didn't one of the other F40s have something up with the bearings and crankshaft?Not an F40, but rather the 4906 suffered a major failure within days of its return to service upon returning from rebuilding/overhaul. It required extensive repair and was OOS for several months.