by Gilbert B Norman
Today's New York Times has an article describing the new terminal station in Berlin.
The article concludes that the station is essentially convenient to "nothing'. It may be a statement with respect to "unification", but certainly not to the city's population center.
Apparently the Zoo station in (West) Berlin will remain, yet the Hauptbanhoff in (East) Berlin will be razed. The Hbf is often shown in History Channel WWII documentaries. I have seen it myself during 1990 and it did not appear that the DDR ever did much to it other than "patch it up' a bit. WWII damage was still quite evident in East Berlin during 1990.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/09/inter ... erlin.html
The article concludes that the station is essentially convenient to "nothing'. It may be a statement with respect to "unification", but certainly not to the city's population center.
Apparently the Zoo station in (West) Berlin will remain, yet the Hauptbanhoff in (East) Berlin will be razed. The Hbf is often shown in History Channel WWII documentaries. I have seen it myself during 1990 and it did not appear that the DDR ever did much to it other than "patch it up' a bit. WWII damage was still quite evident in East Berlin during 1990.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/09/inter ... erlin.html