by kaitoku
Lots of starry-eyed news reports of Chinese HSR (justified in many cases- it is an impressive system), but the Financial Times, in typical British fashion, are not inhibited to point out the other side of the coin (quote taken from article):
China: A future on track
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2b843e4c-c745 ... ab49a.html
But for the European, Japanese and North American companies that have provided much of the technology for the country’s programme, the visit put the spotlight on a worrying trend.source (may be behind subscription firewall, you may have to access through a web search instead):
In what many international executives see as a warning for other industries, these companies have spent years “transferring”, or selling, technology to state-backed partners in exchange for market access – only to be rewarded with shrinking market share in China as a result of state policies that favour local industry.
Now these companies find their high-speed technology has been “digested” – defined by the government as a multistep process of buying foreign technology, innovating on that existing platform then selling it under a domestic brand – by former Chinese partners. Furthermore, the foreigners find themselves competing head-to-head for tenders all over the world with Chinese companies selling digested high-speed technology at discount prices, often with cheap state bank financing thrown in.
China: A future on track
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2b843e4c-c745 ... ab49a.html