• 495s and Power Control?, 08-18-2011

  • Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.
Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

  by jaymac
 
It probably shouldn't have taken so long, but when I saw Dave Hutchinson's SEPO photo on NERAIL ( http://photos.nerail.org/s/?p=192285 ) and Billy Wehmeyer's earlier shot of ED495 ( http://photos.nerail.org/s/?p=192226 ) with 519 as the leader on both, I began the pain-filled process of thinking.
Did the 495 jobs come into existence not so much because of freight-traffic patterns but more for power-utilization needs? CSX power typically doesn't get too deep into D-2, so the 495 jobs -- theoretically at least -- could provide power for SEPO/POSE for the eastern parts of their runs and complementary power for and from the 495s.
Maybe this has already been covered, but I don't remember it.
  by newpylong
 
CSXT power goes to Rigby many times per week... regardless, I don't think ED495 was instituted for any reason but to keep local traffic on it's own train and not the through jobs.