trainhq wrote:I think you have to remember, the Farley project is tied into the ARC project, which will have new platforms way below ground, probably right below Farley
The Farley PO project has
nothing to do with the so-called
Access To The Region's Core "project" (more a bunch of proposals that have not seen the light of day as yet nor will, probably). The Farley building was intended to have been converted to a station concourse with absolutely nothing happening directly underneath at track level, nor under the Hudson River.
As for the ARC itself (not to be confused with "Amtrak Reform Council"), it has almost nothing to do with Amtrak; rather, it is a short-sighted proposal intended to squeeze all of New Jersey Transit's North Jersey and Rockland/Orange counties (NY state) commuter rail lines into
NYP (especially since they took utilization of GCT's lower level off their site due to apparent lack of support from NY state).
Mr. Weaver wrote:People do not go to Penn Station to admire the facility, they go there to board a train out of New York to go somewhere
That may be said of
any railroad station that hosts trains going in and out of any city. Far too general of a statement to really mean anything.
However, NYP has gotten many jeers over its current "architecture". In writing and spoken word, the current NYP is one of the most villified rail stations there is. This view is held worldwide.