M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, Jeff Smith, FL9AC

expbusop
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:13 pm

M9 Cars Design Delivery and Acceptance

Post by expbusop » Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:12 am

Todays NY Post pg 56 Legal Notices MTA LIRR /MNR request for proposal No. 929 for M-9 Passenger Cars

Clean Cab
Posts: 2893
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: South Dennis Massachusetts

Re: M-8 Cars

Post by Clean Cab » Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:43 am

Those are for LIRR. MN will get them a few years later.
I'm stuck on a sandbar on Cape Cod, and I couldn't be happier!!!

Fan Railer
Posts: 2197
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:32 pm

Re: M-8 Cars

Post by Fan Railer » Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:56 pm

how many cars? 84?

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22266
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: M-8 Cars

Post by DutchRailnut » Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:34 pm

M-9's(odd number) would be for Harlem and Hudson, not New Haven (even Number)
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8535
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: If it's Tuesday, It Must Be Belgium

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by Jeff Smith » Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:08 pm

Apologies for the Collateral Damage cleanup. It was actually funny but non-sensical without the quotes.

I saw something on this somewhere else; I'll track it down and add. I think I've posted the RFP here before.

NH line won't need replacements for EMU's for years unless the win every lottery in every state and decide to electrify everything. The M8 fleet is big enough to replace everything AND run on SLE, freeing that fleet for NHHS.

The thing on the M9's I think is a joint proposal for both LIRR and MNRR railroads and interoperability (which would negate the need for the "a" designation for MNRR cars). What that would involve is way too early to speculate on, although current chief Lhota is making big noise on sharing equipment all across the metro area.
Next stop, Willoughby
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

Clean Cab
Posts: 2893
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: South Dennis Massachusetts

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by Clean Cab » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:28 pm

M9s are a joint deal for both LIRR and MNR. LIRR will get the majority of the cars due to them having many more M3's than MNR to replace. I don't know how many M3's LIRR has, but MNR has 142.
I'm stuck on a sandbar on Cape Cod, and I couldn't be happier!!!

Backshophoss
Posts: 6323
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by Backshophoss » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:00 pm

MNR picked ACESII for their PTC,LIRR will always do something different,there will be a M-9(a)
It never fails!
The Land of Enchantment is not Flyover country!

Clean Cab
Posts: 2893
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: South Dennis Massachusetts

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by Clean Cab » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:49 pm

Do you mean ACSES (Advance Civil Speed Enforecment System)?
I'm stuck on a sandbar on Cape Cod, and I couldn't be happier!!!

Backshophoss
Posts: 6323
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by Backshophoss » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:21 pm

I have seen it tagged as ACESII but mean it to Amtrak's version,and LIRR will find their own way to be different.
LIRR has always found a way to change the basic spec's!
The Land of Enchantment is not Flyover country!

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22266
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by DutchRailnut » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:33 pm

MNCR's version is already a cut back version of amtrak's ACSES, to keep it compatible LIRR won't be able to cut it back any more.
and as of M-8's its off the shelf technology that fits M-8, M7 and M7a.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

Fan Railer
Posts: 2197
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:32 pm

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by Fan Railer » Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:08 pm

I'm surprised no one has posted this yet. Yes it is listed under the LIRR procurement page, but there's also an order for M9As which I wonder about, but then again, I just found it and haven't gotten around to reading the documentation yet.
http://mta.info/lirr/about/Procurement/ ... Status.htm
http://mta.info/lirr/about/Procurement/M9/Documents.htm
This will be posted on the LIRR forum, and should perhaps be (for the majority) discussed there.

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8535
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: If it's Tuesday, It Must Be Belgium

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by Jeff Smith » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:26 pm

I found the RFP 6; that's what led me to question the singles, doubles, powered, non, etc. But the site is a good link, thanks!

Here's the status from the above link:
M-9/M-9A Commuter Railcar ProcurementCurrent Status
Long Island Rail Road, on behalf of itself and MetroNorth Commuter Railroad, will shortly issue two simultaneous Request for Proposals for the design, manufacture, test and delivery of up to 676 M-9 and 160 M-9A commuter railcars. Contract award is expected to be made in the 4th Quarter of 2012 with delivery of the first pilot cars for testing expected in the 2nd quarter of 2016.
Next stop, Willoughby
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

lirr42
Posts: 2726
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:16 pm
Location: Montauk, NY (MP 115.8)

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by lirr42 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:09 pm

Will the manufacturer for the M9A cars for Metro-North be able to avoid the "power problems" that the M7A's have (not being able to run in trains longer than 8 cars)? Or will MNR have to keep it's 12 car sets of M3's until they completely and totally die?

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22266
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by DutchRailnut » Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:03 am

on MNCR its not m-7a cars having power problems, but the railroad, upper harlem from Viginia rd to southeast was basicly constructed for max of 6 cars in 1984 and 6 minute headways.
by raising voltage from 625 to 770 volt they were able to run 8 car M series cars, now the M-7a pushed that demand up to 160% for 8 car train.
unless the sub stations are rebuild you won't see trains of over 8 cars, each train cycles on all schedules on both Hudson and Harlem.
on lower Harlem in Bronx longer trains are being operated including 10 car M-8 trains on regular basis.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

amm in ny
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:33 pm

Re: M-9 Cars

Post by amm in ny » Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:27 am

It sounds like you're saying that the new cars (I assume that "M-7a" is the designation for the "new" MUs we're seeing on the Hudson line, I'd always heard "M-7") draw significantly more current than the old ones.

Usually, the new technology is supposed to result in more efficiency, so I'm a bit surprised that the manufacturer(s) wouldn't get some flak over this. What has changed that has increased the amount of power the new trains demand?

Return to “MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail”