Is there any timeline set for closing the single track gap at Ballardvale? Seems crazy to let that one choke point linger for so long after all the time and effort spent on double tracking the rest of the line.
Railroad Forums
BostonUrbEx wrote:There is no funding for the Ballardvale gap. I'd suggest raising the concern with any of your politicians that will listen. Andover, Lawrence, and Haverhill city Councillors who have connections and pull at state levels, or preferably state legislators who can directly secure the funding themselves.Funny, they can come up with 2 billion to extend the green line 4 miles to Medford and close to 4 billion more to extend CR to Fall River and New Bedford (not to mention other questionable expenditures) yet they can't come up with the money to close a quarter mile single track gap in what is arguably the biggest rail transportation choke point in the state. Granted there's station and land concerns as well but the fact that this isn't at the top of the list of things to get done is absurd.
roberttosh wrote:There's no defending South Coast, but how much of Ballardville's problem is visual/psychological vs operational at this point?BostonUrbEx wrote:There is no funding for the Ballardvale gap. I'd suggest raising the concern with any of your politicians that will listen. Andover, Lawrence, and Haverhill city Councillors who have connections and pull at state levels, or preferably state legislators who can directly secure the funding themselves.Funny, they can come up with 2 billion to extend the green line 4 miles to Medford and close to 4 billion more to extend CR to Fall River and New Bedford (not to mention other questionable expenditures) yet they can't come up with the money to close a quarter mile single track gap in what is arguably the biggest rail transportation choke point in the state. Granted there's station and land concerns as well but the fact that this isn't at the top of the list of things to get done is absurd.
Red Wing wrote:Arlington,True, [upon recounting*] inbound AM passengers, and found that 6,700 passed through the Salem tunnel vs 3,000 that traversed Ballardville
You are forgetting Pan Am freights.
Arlington wrote:I'm thinking even if I counted and added Pan Am freights, we're not talking 24 freight trains a day, are we?Freight trains are much longer and take much more time to traverse the same distance as passenger trains. If you weight freight trains more heavily, I'd absolutely say that the Ballardvale choke point is more pressing. Even without freight, it is also likely cheaper to fix on a per passenger cost basis because Salem would be so damn expensive to fix.
gokeefe wrote:Given the extremely low cost to finish Ballardvale vs anything else I doubt it can be beat in terms of "value".Double tracking through the Salem tunnel would be another big dig, or maybe little dig, but definitely in the hundreds of millions.
roberttosh wrote:Furthermore, though maybe not so much in the very near future, the Western Route could see increased train movements with all 3 tenants whereas the Eastern is pretty much limited in that regard since it's a dead end CR route.That is a very serious possibility for freight in particular. The Downeaster is only a matter of time before NNEPRA is able to complete the required improvements for the 6th roundtrip. Pan Am on the other hand could materialize much sooner and in much greater volumes.
gokeefe wrote:Pan Am on the other hand could materialize much sooner and in much greater volumes.How many trains/day now? and "much greater volumes" would be how many more?