Forum Skin

General discussion about the RAILROAD.NET site, forums, or content ONLY. Please do not post your general railroading questions, please choose an appropriate forum. For help using the site, please post in the Help Using RAILROAD.NET Forum.

Moderator: Jeff Smith

Grump
Posts: 913
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Under a ROC

Re: Forum Skin

Post by Grump »

Just to throw in my 2 cents that I agree with the others, I'd also like to...

1. Make it easier to distinguish new posts in forums.
2. Move the poster information and avatar back to the lefthand side.
Attention ladies and gentlemen, we are being held to allow for the same Amtrak train that passed us at Secaucus and Newark to pass us again for the third time. We thank you for your patience.

User avatar
GOLDEN-ARM
Posts: 2774
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:53 pm
Location: " LVRR CRANFORD STATION, 1962"

Re: Forum Skin

Post by GOLDEN-ARM »

On a slightly different note, this reminds me of when we get new power, on the railroad. We lose options we were accustomed to, favorite sights and sounds, etc. Then comes new desktop models, air conditioning, whatever. We always grumble, but somehow, it all becomes familiar, given time. I don't pay for this place, so whatever Mike has to offer, works for me. If I can get online, read, post and have a good time, it's all good. I'm now stuck with locos that don't have porches, with no way to get inside, other than a vertical ladder. Maybe one day, that might seem awesome. Only time will tell. I'm glad to have a decent place to come to. It was a little akward the first few days, but it's not anything that can't be adapted to. Thanks Mike for the upgrade, and to Otto too, for making it all come together. Just my .02 cents, your mileage may vary...... :wink:

Plate F
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Geneva, NY

Re: Forum Skin

Post by Plate F »

And I couldn't help but think of this when I saw Golden-Arm's post.

<sarcasm> Diesel locomotives were a bad change from steam. It just isn't the same :(
</sarcasm>

User avatar
GOLDEN-ARM
Posts: 2774
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:53 pm
Location: " LVRR CRANFORD STATION, 1962"

Re: Forum Skin

Post by GOLDEN-ARM »

One other bit, as far as not knowing how many responses are in a thread. every thread has a counter, on the top and bottom of the page, with a "new post' and a total number of posts, per page. Not too hard to look on the right, and see how many responses to a topic, and if any of them are unread, or not. There wasn't a "quick reply" option, but I see ot on another sight I visit. I'm partial to Verdana, and I use it as default, in all of my email, and notepad/workpad dealings. It could be worse than Trebuchet. It could be Wing-Dings........... :P

User avatar
MEC407
Posts: 10975
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:15 pm

Re: Forum Skin

Post by MEC407 »

I'm just thankful that it's not Comic Sans.

Worst. Font. Ever.

:wink:
MEC407
Moderator:
Pan Am Railways — Boston & Maine/Maine Central — Delaware & Hudson
Central Maine & Quebec/Montreal, Maine & Atlantic/Bangor & Aroostook
Providence & Worcester — New England — GE Locomotives

scotty269
Posts: 2733
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:47 am
Location: Manayunk, Philadelphia, PA

Re: Forum Skin

Post by scotty269 »

The difference between this forum and railroad paint schemes is, it is a point-and-click operation to add an additional forum skin.

User avatar
Otto Vondrak
Posts: 20285
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: New York

Re: Forum Skin

Post by Otto Vondrak »

Ricky Smith wrote:It'd be nice for an admin or mod or someone to chime in so we don't feel neglected :-D
Awww... here's a big hug for Ricky. :-)

We're taking it all in folks. We're reading your comments and adjusting to the new software package as well. As soon as we get a moment, we'll address your comments.

-otto-
----------------------------------------------
Moderator: New York State Railfan :: New York Central :: Toy Trains
NYW&B Fan Site :: A Magazine I Read Often :: A Museum I Volunteer At

MBTA3247
Posts: 2750
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:01 pm
Location: Milton

Re: Forum Skin

Post by MBTA3247 »

Another complaint I have: it's hard to find the Previous and Next Page buttons.
"The destination of this train is [BEEP BEEP]" -announcement on an Ashmont train.

Mike Roque
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Forum Skin

Post by Mike Roque »

First off, my apologies for not responding to all your feedback until now. I was on vacation for a week, and I've been busy handling some family business since my return. Thank you for all the excellent feedback.

So on with the show...
Lirr168 wrote:I think I will get used to the changes eventually, but I find the usernames being on the right to be extremely disorienting. Is there any way to change this as a personal option or would it have to have to be a whole forum change?
Unfortunately, this is hard-coded into the theme. This was a hotly debated decision by the people behind phpBB. The rationale is that the post text is generally more important than the poster's information and should therefore be more prominent (in this case, on the left instead of the right). It is different than the old layout, and make take some getting used to, but it seems to make the topic easier to read in general. I think it makes sense.
pgengler wrote:The "new"/"no new" icons aren't visually distinctive enough to tell at a quick glance which is which. The old icons at least had the big area in the middle that was empty (white) when there was nothing new and yellow when new; the new ones differ only in color, and with the dark gray/black and dark red, especially on an LCD when you're not looking exactly head-on, they're very similar.
I agree...the icons in the image set are hard to tell apart. The can be changed, and I plan to do so as soon as I can.
pgengler wrote:[*]The "Mark forums read" link at the top of the index page. On the old version, this was at the bottom, and it was great, because the way I look at the forum is like this: open the page, scroll down, opening the forums I'm interested in in new tabs, then click "Mark forums read" once I got to the bottom so that I didn't see the same threads as new. Since I'd already opened the forums before clicking the link, the various threads in the forums still had the appropriate new/no new icons. Now, if I do the same thing, I have to get back to the top of the page before I can click the link. (I know that it's only one keystroke, Home, but when I'm browsing the forums my hand is on the mouse, not the keyboard, and scrolling all the way back to the top isn't the speediest thing.)
That makes sense...it certainly wouldn't hurt to have a "back to top" link at the bottom. There's a Board Index link, but it is a link to the page, not a bookmark, so it doesn't help your situation. Is the Home key really that far away? :)
pgengler wrote:The page links for threads when viewing a forum on the far right of the table column. This separates them from the thread, especially when you're scanning down the list. It's very easy to click the thread title and end up on the first page of a thread instead of the last (which is usually where the new posts are, when you check in frequently enough).
Well, there is the "latest post" link at the right in both the forum and topic listing pages. I think the page links are in a fairly good spot on the topic list page.
pgengler wrote:No "quick reply" box at the bottom of a thread. I'm not 100% sure if this was there on the old skin, but I have it on other forums and it's nice to have, saving a click and a page load to post a reply.
I don't think phpBB ever had this...I'm not sure why.
pgengler wrote:I'm not really a big fan of moving the "user info" for a post to the right side from the left (since it's a pretty useless change for no reason and differs from nearly every other forum out there) but that's something I can learn to live with, I suppose.
It wasn't useless...it was quite calculated as I mentioned above.
Gerry6309 wrote:I have seen phpBB3 forums which are much more readable than this one. Contrast is very poor. There are multiple "skins" available which can be user selected if the option is made available.
Yeah, the monochromatic blue scheme is a little weak on contrast. I'll investigate some other themes. We're mainly concerned about quality (both visual and code) and maintainability.
Gerry6309 wrote:The performance issue is a big plus, though, and the webmaster deserves kudos for that!
MEC407 wrote:The increase in speed and reliability (which is thanks to new hardware, I assume?) is very nice indeed!
Thanks, guys. Yeah, the old server was just too slow and didn't have enough memory. We got a server with 2x the CPU and 4x the memory, and it shows.
TheOneCalledA1 wrote:The difference between this forum and railroad paint schemes is, it is a point-and-click operation to add an additional forum skin.
Well, kinda. I do have to customize it with the RAILROAD.NET header and integrate ad serving system, so it does take a minor amount of work to put a theme into use.
Mike Roqué
Road Foreman of Engines
Placerville & Sacramento Valley Railroad

Return to “General Discussion: About RAILROAD.NET”