Track gauge question

This may be a silly question, but when the MTA/conrail took over the bankrupt railroads, including those west of hudson, did each of them have a different track width? I know the Erie used the widest gauge at 6'. Did the Fed's set a standard or did they just use different equipment to accommodate?

no all the railroad at that time were standard gauge.
1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in)

The Erie converted to standard gauge (4' 8.5") in 1880, so it hasn't been an issue for well over a century.

All major railroads were standard by 1900. Nothing common carrier freight on either side of the Hudson was wide or narrow.

OK. Thats what i thought. Historically, does anyone know if the standard gauge width was initiated by the federal govt back then?

not really, basically got dictated by it already being standard in Europe.

Originally the individual railroads made their own choice of gauge, with many adopting the European standard; the Federal Government got into it when Abraham Lincoln ruled that the Overland Route (Union Pacific and Central Pacific) would be standard gauge. (Maury Klein, in his history of the UP.) At that time many railroads in the South still had ~5-foot gauge, but after that the handwriting was on the wall.

Nothing common carrier freight on either side of the Hudson was wide or narrow.

The last Maine two-footer shut down in the 1940s.

Lee

Is that what is now the narrow gauge museum in Portland now? Went there once as a kid.

GirlOnTheTrain wrote:Is that what is now the narrow gauge museum in Portland now? Went there once as a kid.

The Maine Narrow Gauge Railroad Co. & Museum in Portland is 2 Foot. Over this past summer I visited the Wiscasset, Waterville and Farmington Railway (WW&F), also a 2 Foot gauge, in Alna, ME.
JoeD

think this tread has proceeded past the derail.