This interesting discussion has led me to dig out some old River Division
timetables, here are some tidbits of dates that I came up with:
Last timetable that showed four tracks between North Bergen and Dumont
except over Little Ferry Bridge was dated 4-29-56
I might be missing a timetable in between as the number series start[ed
over at no. 1 on 4-28-57 which only showed two tracks over the above
stretch.
Timetable no. 3 dated 4-27-58 was the last timetable to show passenger
service to Albany and points between. Supplement no. 1 to this timetable
took effect 6-30-58 and abolished all passenger service west of West
Haverstraw. A few trains terminated at West Norwood but most of them
terminated at West Haverstraw. A B/O took effect 7-29-58 and extended
the trains that terminated at West Norwood on to West Haverstraw and
contained the schedules for the extended trains.
The last passenger trains ran on or about December 11, 1959 between
Weehawken and West Haverstraw. I do not have a B/O or a timetable
supplement but I do have a clipping with that date on it. Trains all over
the northeast were coming off "like flies" at that time. Every major
railroad was cutting trains and the timetables were getting smaller and
small at that time.
The next timetable no. 6 showed single track between Kingston and
Selkirk with operation by timetable and train orders and an ABS in effect.
Same timetable showed three west bound freight trains as second class
trains.
Timetable no. 7, dated 10-30-60 showed single track between West Nyack
and Selkirk. Block and interlocking stations at the time were at:
National Junction (NJ), Willow Avenue (AV), Weehawken (TU), North
Bergen (WE), Little Ferry (FY), West Haverstraw (WH), West Point (WP),
Newburgh (GY), Kingston (KY), Alsen (AN) and Selkirk Jct (SK).
At that time, West Haverstraw, West Point, Newburgh and Alsen were not
shown as interlockings but only as block stations.
TCS rules apparently were in effect as far as Bogota from Weehawken.
Timetable no. 16 of 10-31-65 showed TCS rules in effect all the way and
dwarf signals and spring switches on the sidings.
Finally, timetable no. 22 of 11-5-67 showed control points and interlockings at the ends of the sidings as we knew them during our times
there.
Even during my time (and your's too), it would have helped somewhat if
all of the sidings had been circuited, upgraded and maintained for 30 MPH
operation, with the weather conditions and other things that we
encountered on this line, it could have helped us a lot and saved time on
the many meets as well.
It was an interesting period.
I have most of the timetables of this period but I wish I had them all.
Noel Weaver