by MEC407
bostontrainguy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2024 10:38 am I don't understand your comment. Pan Am had lots of same destinations:I think that was exactly his point. Two-letter station codes are feasible when you have, say, a 4,000-route-mile system (i.e. when Guilford was at its largest in 1984), but CSX operates 22,000 route miles and it would be difficult to assign two-letter codes to that many stations. Three-letter codes, like those used by BNSF, would give them much more breathing room, and would certainly make things more easily decipherable for railfans; unfortunately for us, CSX probably wouldn't see any benefit from their perspective relative to the time and cost of making the change.
. . .
I guess if you mean Springfield, MA vs. Springfield, IL, they could use a three letter code like SPM vs. SPI
MEC407
Moderator:
Pan Am Railways — Boston & Maine/Maine Central — Delaware & Hudson
Central Maine & Quebec/Montreal, Maine & Atlantic/Bangor & Aroostook
Providence & Worcester — New England — GE Locomotives
Moderator:
Pan Am Railways — Boston & Maine/Maine Central — Delaware & Hudson
Central Maine & Quebec/Montreal, Maine & Atlantic/Bangor & Aroostook
Providence & Worcester — New England — GE Locomotives