by Matt Langworthy
nydepot wrote:Max sped was 30mph with a whole lot of 15s and slow orders. Derailments were very common. It was relatively easy to chase if you knew the area.Operative words: if you knew the area. It might 've been difficult to jog back and forth on back roads that were probably had a 35-40 mph speed limit, especially in an unfamiliar area. Trust me, I've lost track of trains in unfamiliar areas... the difficulty of trying to conduct a chase of the Rochester branch on winding back roads would've been hard.
nydepot wrote: Easiest to follow was the Buffalo line with the road within shooting distance. Then the Rochester and then the Elmira. Elmira had the convenience of Rt 14/414 but it was not close and you needed to keep jutting over to it. It was also a faster line. With the traffic density, people tended to wait at a location and have the trains come to them.I'm not doubting that you spoke to Shaughnessy and others. Nor is there any doubt he captured Penny steam on film. Heck, I referred back to source books which have Shaughnessy's photos while researching steam on the PRR for this discussion. However, his photos are in books pertaining to the Elmira Branch. I've seen nothing pertaining to the Rochester Branch. Again, absence of proof and proof of absence are not necessarily the same thing... but the lack of photographs for the Rochester Branch leads me to believe it was not a prime destination for railfans.
Shaughnessy was taking photos when it was still steam. Again, I talked to him.
I'm not guessing on this stuff. I talked to Shaughnessy and others (1000+ interviews). I'm not an expert but I know firsthand from many people who lived and chased the line what as possible and not.
Matt Langworthy
"It is highly likely that the 1990s were an overrated decade."
"It is highly likely that the 1990s were an overrated decade."