by newpylong
Would have already happened. Not going to change the series now, no reason to.
Railroad Forums
Moderator: MEC407
MEC407 wrote:http://photos.greatrails.net/s/?p=239980That is probably the first photo I have ever seen where Pan Am's image so clearly upstaged a Class I.
riffian wrote:That's not a "business train" . . . Unlike PanAm, FEC doesn't field a business train . . .How do you figure? They keep an observation car ("Azalea") and a standalone HEP generator just for the heck of it? It might be just one car and just one generator, but a train's a train, and they conduct company business aboard it; by definition, wouldn't that make it a business train?
Engineer Spike wrote:Where is the info about the number which the software shows having to be the same as the road number? After the Conrail split, I had lots of Conrail engines, which had been renumbered for NS. The display screen had Conrail xxxx, while the road number had been changed. These were microprocessor units, like SD60Ms, and -8 40CWs.New FRA or other agency rule? Don't know. Thats what I'd heard.