by Jamesen
Put this here, since LIRR owns the rail corridor.
Anyone know the current relevance of the lowered track through the active tunnel? I've read that the lowering was tied to the use of specially designed cars, for carrying intermodal containers through the relatively low underpasses on Long Island. But, that the effort was abandoned after bogie related derailment problems.
Ergo, is there any current purpose for using the higher clearance tunnel over the others?
I ask this, because the MTA's PEL report prospectus on the IBX (which isn't really 'X'; another marketing ploy) has the freight track moving one tunnel over. The report covers many construction needs, including that of rehabilitating the tunnels chosen, for passenger rail, to be compliant with federal regulations, but yet there is no mention at all about making the 'new' (2/3 mile) freight tunnel fit the dimensions of the current freight tunnel.
The PEL report covers the history of the tunnels, including the track lowering in the one, but doesn't make note of the clearance need no longer being relevant.
Any inside scoops on this?
Anyone know the current relevance of the lowered track through the active tunnel? I've read that the lowering was tied to the use of specially designed cars, for carrying intermodal containers through the relatively low underpasses on Long Island. But, that the effort was abandoned after bogie related derailment problems.
Ergo, is there any current purpose for using the higher clearance tunnel over the others?
I ask this, because the MTA's PEL report prospectus on the IBX (which isn't really 'X'; another marketing ploy) has the freight track moving one tunnel over. The report covers many construction needs, including that of rehabilitating the tunnels chosen, for passenger rail, to be compliant with federal regulations, but yet there is no mention at all about making the 'new' (2/3 mile) freight tunnel fit the dimensions of the current freight tunnel.
The PEL report covers the history of the tunnels, including the track lowering in the one, but doesn't make note of the clearance need no longer being relevant.
Any inside scoops on this?