ApproachMedium wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 9:33 pm
Too much thinking inside the box. if your putting in double track, both services would use it. The ability to have bi directional traffic with two tracks makes the system versatile. Each service having a dedicated track would cramp any ability to get around because you would STILL need passing sidings.
It depends which hypothetical scenario happens. If it's LRT, freight trains, by federal law, cannot run on LRT tracks when LRT consists are using them, and vice versa. The only way around this would be to have them time separated, which would surely do a number to the customers of this line if they can only receive cars late at night, or to have them run on different tracks at the same time, like the GCL proposal would do.
That being said, this line doesn't have consistent daily freight usage at this moment, so LRT being added wouldn't change much. Hell, forget consistent daily usage, it barely gets consistent weekly usage! But that is probably going to change with things like an upgraded and new Raritan River Bridge, a connection between Freehold and Farmingdale, sand trains for the Hudson River Tunnels, and the murky future of the Southern from Woodmansie-Winslow
If it was simply heavy commuter rail it wouldn't be too much of an issue. Ideally, like Bracdude said, freight and passenger should be run/operated by the same operator, much like how UP/BNSF run some (government paid) commuter trains out west on their freight lines. Or how the PRR and CNJ did things from their inception right until their demise.