wasnt that long ago...
http://binged.it/11NYZKC
Railroad Forums
Moderator: MEC407
thebigham wrote:Too bad.
The pics posted are near here?
http://binged.it/ZVGSQ7
truman wrote:I ran into one of my trackside spy's yesterday and this is what he told me;It appears the last train in Hampton was in September of 2008.
Foss Mfg. is a self contained industry in that they make their own power with a multi-fuel generating plant, they are not dependent on the local power grid, the only thing they need is a fuel source. ( I believe they have their own sewer and water as well) Evidently someone down there watches rates for the best deal, and figured out it is cheaper at the moment to buy fuel in bulk than it is to buy it from the local gas company. This is why, a few days ago, an engine snuck down to Hampton in the evening with a tank of LNG, spotted it at Foss, and while the crew went to dinner, Fosses people pumped the car out, the crew then returned to Portsmouth with the empty.
This would account for the recently shined rails. Anyone who lives down that way (Mr. Bolt?) could keep an eye on the place. Maybe do a drive by once in a while in the evening to see if anything is going on.
b&m 1566 wrote:truman wrote:I ran into one of my trackside spy's yesterday and this is what he told me;It appears the last train in Hampton was in September of 2008.
Foss Mfg. is a self contained industry in that they make their own power with a multi-fuel generating plant, they are not dependent on the local power grid, the only thing they need is a fuel source. ( I believe they have their own sewer and water as well) Evidently someone down there watches rates for the best deal, and figured out it is cheaper at the moment to buy fuel in bulk than it is to buy it from the local gas company. This is why, a few days ago, an engine snuck down to Hampton in the evening with a tank of LNG, spotted it at Foss, and while the crew went to dinner, Fosses people pumped the car out, the crew then returned to Portsmouth with the empty.
This would account for the recently shined rails. Anyone who lives down that way (Mr. Bolt?) could keep an eye on the place. Maybe do a drive by once in a while in the evening to see if anything is going on.
You don't suppose this could be someone stealing the hardware from the Hampton Branch?
joshg1 wrote:Pan Am hired the scrappers. The Rockingham Registry of Deeds website isn't working, but I'm fairly certain the State hasn't bought the land yet. They were granted money by the Feds for a trail, but may not have received it. NH RSA 228:60a,b, +c is railbanking, 216-F is the trail system.Saw lots of walkers yesterday on the (former) rail bed just south of the Route 27 bridge in Hampton. Ties stacked off to one side, conversion moving quickly. Hampton has expressed an interest in turning the ROW into a two lane road to access more potential industrial/commercial land. Local groups want to make sure there is room for a bike trail adjacent to whatever happens.
artman wrote:I believe that was some low- brain-celled local pol who suggested that one, and the idea was roundly panned by the locals.joshg1 wrote:Pan Am hired the scrappers. The Rockingham Registry of Deeds website isn't working, but I'm fairly certain the State hasn't bought the land yet. They were granted money by the Feds for a trail, but may not have received it. NH RSA 228:60a,b, +c is railbanking, 216-F is the trail system.Saw lots of walkers yesterday on the (former) rail bed just south of the Route 27 bridge in Hampton. Ties stacked off to one side, conversion moving quickly. Hampton has expressed an interest in turning the ROW into a two lane road to access more potential industrial/commercial land. Local groups want to make sure there is room for a bike trail adjacent to whatever happens.
F-line to Dudley via Park wrote:I live near Portsmouth and I just don't ever see it happening. The population density is just too low. Dover is proximate to four cites totaling 5 times as many people (Dover, Somersworth, Rochester, Portsmouth) and it is only a ten minute drive. Durham is maybe 15.artman wrote:I believe that was some low- brain-celled local pol who suggested that one, and the idea was roundly panned by the locals.joshg1 wrote:Pan Am hired the scrappers. The Rockingham Registry of Deeds website isn't working, but I'm fairly certain the State hasn't bought the land yet. They were granted money by the Feds for a trail, but may not have received it. NH RSA 228:60a,b, +c is railbanking, 216-F is the trail system.Saw lots of walkers yesterday on the (former) rail bed just south of the Route 27 bridge in Hampton. Ties stacked off to one side, conversion moving quickly. Hampton has expressed an interest in turning the ROW into a two lane road to access more potential industrial/commercial land. Local groups want to make sure there is room for a bike trail adjacent to whatever happens.
Seacoast really wants passenger rail back...or at least prevention against it not coming back...so the meetings about interim trailing have been careful to stress rail-with-trail compatibility for whatever they do. They really don't want to blow it because the East Coast Greenway national org is targeting this ROW and there might be a funding source to do something nice with it. Goes through so much uninhabited land it's a pretty ideal one for rail-with-trail should it ever be reactivated. Not like it's really going to need more than single track + a siding or two north of Newburyport.
There was a plan a few years back for a ferry connection to Provincetown from Portsmouth. Now, that would bring the people in.
artman
joshg1 wrote:Western Route to Haverhill is slower than Eastern Route to Newburyport because of the curves, freight congestion, and lower speeds. A Newburyport train making all 12 stops takes about 1:05-1:10, and does a full 79 MPH north of North Beverly. An Anderson-Haverhill express making only 8 stops takes the same amount of time, but is much more frequently delayed. I'm not as familiar with current avg. speeds from Plaistow to Newfields other than there probably isn't a much higher gear than the Downeaster currently does. And yes the sluggish Lowell Line bottleneck can be mitigated quite a bit with some signal modernization. But there's not a lot they can do that's going to lift speeds from Wilmington Jct. to the border even if they resignaled it to Class 4 spec. The track geometry is what it is.There was a plan a few years back for a ferry connection to Provincetown from Portsmouth. Now, that would bring the people in.Also- is running passenger trains to Portsmouth via Rock Jct that much worse than going via Newburyport? Exeter and Newburyport aren't that far away.
artman
joshg1 wrote:Nope - the plans were all in place for a summer ferry connection until the ferry owner got a better offer. Daytrip summer traffic would be good be those two.There was a plan a few years back for a ferry connection to Provincetown from Portsmouth. Now, that would bring the people in.
artman
Off topic, but really? You haven't made a typo? Boston of Portland to Ports, a cruise along the coast, I can see. Neither Portsmouth (NH+ME) nor Provincetown are going to provide much traffic to the other. I have a cousin who has parents in Newington and works in Eastham, she might be the passenger.
Also- is running passenger trains to Portsmouth via Rock Jct that much worse than going via Newburyport? Exeter and Newburyport aren't that far away.