CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, Jeff Smith, FL9AC

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8193
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: MP 67.2 Georgia Southern Railway

CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by Jeff Smith » Sat Feb 16, 2019 5:45 pm

https://www.westport-news.com/news/arti ... 616841.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
...
Senate Bill No. 163, “An Act Concerning Wireless Internet Availability on the New Haven Line of the Metro-North Commuter Railroad,” would require Metro-North to provide high-quality, complimentary wireless Internet access to riders of the New Haven train line.

“When Boston’s commuter rail service supports Wi-Fi service, Connecticut is placed at a competitive disadvantage. Employers tell us that improving our outdated infrastructure is crucial to revitalizing our economy. Realtors tell us that potential buyers look closely at the commuting experience before investing in our community. We cannot afford to allow Metro-North to remain stuck in the past,†said Sen. Haskell. “Connecticut commuters deserve better than to be forced to rely on frankly unreliable phone service.”

Senate Bill No. 448, “An Act Authorizing Bonds of the State for the Construction of a Canopy Covering The Platform at the Talmadge Hill Train Station in New Canaan,” would authorize state bonds to provide a grant-in-aid to construct a canopy to provide protection against the elements at the Talmadge Hill Train Station in New Canaan.

“We cannot in good faith encourage public transportation while asking commuters to wait in the rain for their train,” said Haskell. “I hear constantly from both Democrats and Republicans in New Canaan that the experience of commuting to Manhattan must improve in order to bolster New Canaan’s real estate market. Most other Metro-North train stations offer canopies that prevent riders from getting soaked. I’m working hard to have one built for my constituents in New Canaan.”
...
Next stop, Willoughby
~Jeff Smith (fka "Sarge") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22146
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13
Contact:

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by DutchRailnut » Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:29 pm

never happen , since cars are operated in pairs it would take over 220 full size installations and a network that won't exist.
just so commuters can go with cheapest poor functioning cell provider ? will CT pay for all this ?

as for talmadge hill canopy , each train I operated there had people get there after train arrived and dashing across to get to choo choo , so is a canopy really cost effective ?
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

excitebike
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:42 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by excitebike » Sun Feb 17, 2019 9:37 am

Interestingly, I've noticed that recently many M8s and M7s are broadcasting SSIDs for wifi; they are named with e.g. "M8" plus the car number. If this big installation isn't for consumer use, what else could they be for?

RearOfSignal
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:31 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by RearOfSignal » Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:07 am

The Wi-Fi on the trains is so that the video from the interior cameras can be downloaded wirelessly for immediate review. It is not for public use.
Hurry up and wait at the signal!

njt/mnrrbuff
Posts: 3342
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:33 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by njt/mnrrbuff » Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:29 am

Talmadge Hill should have some sort of canopy. Maybe it doesn't have to cover the whole platform. While the New Canaan Branch might see good ridership, the question is does it warrant enough in terms of having the canopy cover the entire platform?

User avatar
GirlOnTheTrain
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by GirlOnTheTrain » Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:31 pm

Build canopy or buy umbrellas...hmmmmmm
"I am no longer just a girl on the train, going back and forth without point or purpose."

Moderator: Amtrak, MTA Metro-North, MTA New York City Subway/PATH/NYC Area Light Rail

ExCon90
Posts: 4199
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:22 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by ExCon90 » Sun Feb 17, 2019 3:26 pm

DutchRailnut wrote:as for talmadge hill canopy , each train I operated there had people get there after train arrived and dashing across to get to choo choo , so is a canopy really cost effective ?
If it's raining, are they sitting in their cars until they see the train? (Or would they do that on cold days anyway?)

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22146
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13
Contact:

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by DutchRailnut » Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:52 pm

they run no matter what , rain snow sun , no one wants to wait on platform.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

Backshophoss
Posts: 6000
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by Backshophoss » Sun Feb 17, 2019 5:48 pm

Did ConnDOT tear down the "Bus shelter" on the Platform?

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22146
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13
Contact:

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by DutchRailnut » Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:36 pm

nope
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

R36 Combine Coach
Posts: 5385
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:51 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by R36 Combine Coach » Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:56 pm

The Talmadge Hill station was built 1972 just before the M-2s were accepted for service. Anyone know what older station was there before?
Since my friend continues to chain smoke nonstop, she is probably an Alco.

Roadgeek Adam
Posts: 1356
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:01 am
Location: Somewhere in Western New York
Contact:

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by Roadgeek Adam » Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:29 pm

Talmadge Hill had a wooden tower station with a wooden platform.
...they are solid plastic, so don't settle for imitation.

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22146
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13
Contact:

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by DutchRailnut » Wed Feb 20, 2019 7:08 am

Current platform with shelters.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/29997762@N05/33673559244" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

TomNelligan
Posts: 3298
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 5:43 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by TomNelligan » Wed Feb 20, 2019 10:14 am

R36 Combine Coach wrote:The Talmadge Hill station was built 1972 just before the M-2s were accepted for service. Anyone know what older station was there before?
Here is one of my photos of the 1960's station.

http://www.railpictures.net/photo/664169/

Backshophoss
Posts: 6000
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: CT legislation: WiFi and Talmadege Hill Canopy

Post by Backshophoss » Wed Feb 20, 2019 7:29 pm

Paywalled,unless you allow adware! :( :( :(

Post Reply

Return to “MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail”