There have been reports at various recognized media outlets that Neo-PANAMAX traffic is simply not meeting expectations.
As I noted elsewhere at this Forum, I drove by on the NJTurnpike, Port Elizabeth last month - an awful lot of cranes were Skyward.
Now today in The Journal are two articles related to maritime shipping that for anyone around here who holds as I do, that the fortunes of maritime shipping and the railroads are "hand and glove", will not enjoy reading:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/more-pain-a ... 1478096872" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.wsj.com/articles/maersk-shar ... 1478076992" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm set during February to "come on down" for a Cleveland Orchestra concert during their Miami residency. I fear I will see Skyward cranes out at the Port.
I'm not prepared to say at this time that the State of Florida "placed a bad bet" when they chose to make their Ports into something beyond a "Love Nest for the Love Tubs". I also note that, as Mr. Cowford, who I believe is a professional in maritime shipping affairs once noted, if one port upgrades for Neo-PANAMAX shipping, so must others. Even if I personally question the propriety of this "herd mentality" in any business endeavor (including digital "prostitution" of copyrighted content by print media rights holders themselves), "If one does it, so must we" is indeed prevalent throughout the business community.