So what you're proposing is offpeak all stations get a train, but in certain peak times in one direction you'll then eliminate service to some stations deemed to be local, but provide increased service to some stations deemed to be express, expecting the local passengers to ride past their stop, then change to a local train to return to the stop they had missed.
Ok, I can try to imagine that there must be some combination of number of stops, speed of track and train, number of outbound expresses that turn around and return as locals, and length of route where that might result in reduced wait and travel time for all passengers. Or at least reduced travel time for passengers destined for those express stops and increased service for passengers travelling in the return direction.
And I know of some people who like to catch the express that goes one stop past theirs. Especially if the express comes first, and has enough empty seats. Another example is New York Coney Island, the B D F and N all run from there to 34th St and 6th Ave Manhatten. I'm sure there must be somebody who wants to go to 23rd St, local stop F and N, who at least once in a while takes a B or D to 34th St. But most of the folks who have to backtrack to their local stop will probably be worse off than they would have been if there was a direct train.
And meanwhile those local people are taking up space on the express train, and contributing to its station dwell time, which might have been better managed in a more traditional express-local arrangement.
And you have folks at the local stations who want to go outbound who then have to travel inbound first on those less crowded trains you refer to, but then will contribute their bodies to an outgoing express train. And the really disadvantaged person who want to go outbound from one local station to another, they have to take 3 trains: local the wrong direction, express the correct direction past their origin and then past their destination, then local train backtracking a second time.
I've never heard of it done for regular service, only for breakdowns or local track out of service. I don't see much advantage to it. You'd not only need 1 major starting point, such as your example Baltimore's Camden Yards, but also major debarkation points. But a rising tide of passengers tends to lift all stations' usage.