My Grandfather immigrated from Norway to the US in 1886 and arrived at the port of Boston. He was heading for Minnesota. In looking at the maps in the "Atlas of North American Railroads," it looks like the most logical line for him to take would have been the New York Central as far as Chicago. And then connect with the Burlington to Minneapolis. Does that sound reasonable?
My second question has to do with the route. The map indicates two possible routes - one via Clevealand and Toledo, and one through Ontario and Detroit. Which would have been the logical route in 1886?
I am sorry to say that I never had the opportunity to ride the New York Central - I am from ot west in Oregon - but my brother had a Lionel 027 gage electric train set powered by a Hudson 4-6-4 locomtive that we enjoyed very much when we were kids. It would have been a thrill to have seen the real locomotive in action!
gopher56
My second question has to do with the route. The map indicates two possible routes - one via Clevealand and Toledo, and one through Ontario and Detroit. Which would have been the logical route in 1886?
I am sorry to say that I never had the opportunity to ride the New York Central - I am from ot west in Oregon - but my brother had a Lionel 027 gage electric train set powered by a Hudson 4-6-4 locomtive that we enjoyed very much when we were kids. It would have been a thrill to have seen the real locomotive in action!
gopher56