by ryanwc
Let’s think of the math. Significant EB revenue from sleeper pax and other longer distance travelers, 16% increase in overall pax which mathematically has to cluster in short-haul pax. MSP-Chgo made up only a portion of pre-Botealis short-distance riders. Decline in revenue.
MSP-Chgo ticket prices would have to fall off a cliff to cause that. They’d have to be giving away EB tickets on the MSP segment in large numbers. Were they charging $400 for a Chgo-Ms trip previously? LOL let’s keep grasping at straws to find a way to criticize this experiment.
The curiosity seekers line is gonna be requoted forever! A wonderful distillation of knee-jerk cynicism. For years, sober minds had to remind railfans there aren’t enough of them to have a serious effect on ridership. That it can only work if it provides a serious transportation alternative. And now when a train takes off, it’s the rail cynics who are like “that’s just all those tailfans!”
It really only works to locate the revenue issue in sleeper ticket revenue.
MSP-Chgo ticket prices would have to fall off a cliff to cause that. They’d have to be giving away EB tickets on the MSP segment in large numbers. Were they charging $400 for a Chgo-Ms trip previously? LOL let’s keep grasping at straws to find a way to criticize this experiment.
The curiosity seekers line is gonna be requoted forever! A wonderful distillation of knee-jerk cynicism. For years, sober minds had to remind railfans there aren’t enough of them to have a serious effect on ridership. That it can only work if it provides a serious transportation alternative. And now when a train takes off, it’s the rail cynics who are like “that’s just all those tailfans!”
It really only works to locate the revenue issue in sleeper ticket revenue.