WoH Port Jervis Line Service, Studies, Work, Status

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, Jeff Smith, FL9AC

railtrailbiker
Posts: 535
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: Bergen County, NJ

WoH Port Jervis Line Service, Studies, Work, Status

Post by railtrailbiker » Mon Mar 29, 2004 10:04 pm

West-of-Hudson commuters gave Metro-North Railroad a 77 percent satisfaction rate in 2003.
In releasing the results of its mid-October customer satisfaction survey, the railroad said the percentage included 14 percent who were very satisfied and 63 percent who were satisfied.
By line, 86 percent of Pascack Valley riders said they were satisfied compared with 74 percent of Port Jervis riders. Similarly, 38 percent of Pascack Valley riders said service had improved in 2003 compared with 19 percent of Port Jervis riders.
In contrast, riders on Metro-North's three east-of-Hudson lines reported a 93 percent satisfaction rate.

http://www.recordonline.com/archive/200" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... trains.htm

hsr_fan

Post by hsr_fan » Tue Mar 30, 2004 12:39 am

The Port Jervis line could certainly use higher speeds. That's a long way to commute every day! I don't know how people manage to commute from as far as Port Jervis into the city every day.

North of Suffern, there are few if any grade crossings. Stations are spaced fairly far apart. It seems like a logical place to upgrade the signaling and increase top speed from the current 79 mph to 90 or 100.

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22260
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Post by DutchRailnut » Tue Mar 30, 2004 8:26 am

firsts its still stick rail not welded, a project mncr is tackeling very soon.
best speed will be 79 , since the line is not equipped with atc/cabs. and not likely to get it anytime soon becaue of freight still using that line.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

railtrailbiker
Posts: 535
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: Bergen County, NJ

New trains on Port Jervis Line

Post by railtrailbiker » Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:57 am

Rockland train riders in Suffern and Sloatsburg will have two options added to their schedules starting tomorrow, though they'll have to be early risers to catch the one headed into Manhattan.

Metro-North Railroad, which contracts with NJ Transit to take care of its Rockland and Orange County riders, is adding a train that leaves Sloatsburg at 5:22 a.m and Suffern at 5:29 a.m., primarily due to market research. That, and a new train coming home at night, will be part of schedule changes.

The morning run originates in Port Jervis at 4:02 a.m. and arrives in Hoboken at 6:11 a.m., to allow riders to reach Penn Station at 6:20 a.m. It will run without stops from Suffern to Hoboken.

http://www.thejournalnews.com/newsroom/ ... rvice.html

SecaucusJunction
Posts: 3082
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 9:40 pm
Location: NS Watchdog

Port Jervis Line Upgrade

Post by SecaucusJunction » Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:32 am

I thought the entire Port Jervis Line was going to get welded rail from Suffern to Port Jervis this summer. Why hasnt this happened?

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22260
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Post by DutchRailnut » Tue Aug 03, 2004 11:27 am

kind of hard to do entire line in one summer, besides changing the rail all hardware needs to be changed as the stick rail is not same weight as CWR to be put there.
MNCR has been putting 186 Lbs rail everywere lately so all tie plates etc need to be changed because of bigger footprint.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

johnpbarlow
Posts: 2120
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:50 pm

Post by johnpbarlow » Tue Aug 03, 2004 7:57 pm

186 pound rail - that's huge! Guilford only wanted 136 lbs for 79 mph Downeaster service! ;-)

DutchRailnut
Posts: 22260
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: released from Stalag 13

Post by DutchRailnut » Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:07 pm

When you replace rail for future you go with max available, not what is tolerable, either way you need to change plates etc so why not go for latest, putting in 136 Lbs rail now and not being able (imagine) to put in Concrete ties for that rail in 10 years would only double the cost.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???

Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.

7 Train

Port Jervis operation by MNR

Post by 7 Train » Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:50 pm

Currently Port Jervis West of Hudson service is operated under a NJ Transit/Metro-North partership. NJT operates the trains with NJT crews under contract and MNR provides services (station and ticketing) for service north of Suffern.

But here's a possiblity to turn WOH service into a 100% MNR operation:

A MNR crew station could be built at Port Jervis. All WOH equipment (GP40FH-2s, GP40PH-2, F40PH-2s, Comets II/IIBs, Comet Vs) would be now be based out of Port Jervis. MNR crews (not NJT) would operate the trains to/from Hoboken out of Port Jervis, using NJT trackage rights south of Suffern.

Alcochaser
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 4:20 am

Post by Alcochaser » Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:56 am

I think you will only see this type of operation is someone actually manages to build a cross hudson rail bridge.

Connect the West Of Hudson lines to part of the old Putnam Branch and bring them into GCT.

Lackawanna484

Post by Lackawanna484 » Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:31 am

From Suffern, run them across the Piermont Branch / Suffern Industrial through Nanuet Jct, and out to Piermont. Where they could take the ferry to Tarrytown. Not much chance of that, though.

JoeG

Port Jervis line question

Post by JoeG » Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:31 pm

Today I took a ride to Port Jervis. I noticed that double track extends to just east of the Sloatsburg station--apparently it ends at a CP called Sterling.
Does anyone know why the double track extends that far? I'd have thought it wouldn't have extended past the Suffern yard.

Lackawanna484

Post by Lackawanna484 » Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:37 pm

Years ago, Sterling had three tracks. There was a center siding (!) which served as the interchange for the Sterling Mountain Railroad, a forest and mining line. There was an attended station and operator, as well. The double track continued from Suffern to Newburgh Jct until about the mid-1980s, IIRC, when it was cut back.

EJ Quinby has a short piece in his North Jersey Transit book about a hike from the Sterling station up along the SM Railroad into the hills.

JoeG

Post by JoeG » Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:01 pm

If the Tappan Zee replacement happens, with a railroad bridge and/or tunnel, and a restored Piermont branch, it might happen. But when last seen, the estimates were $9 billion and climbing, and we haven't even gotten to the NIMBY problems. I'd say, maybe my grandchildren will see it. If we get $10 gas, maybe the project will get some momentum.

ajt
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 11:11 pm

Post by ajt » Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:30 pm

CP Sterling allows a long freight to sit while the other end is clear of the Hillburn crossovers.

Return to “MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail”