MNRR Hudson Line Electrification

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, FL9AC, Jeff Smith

EuroStar
Posts: 795
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:26 pm
Location: Middle of Nowhere

Re: Metro-North Hudson Line Electrification

Post by EuroStar »

No reason to worry about the tunnels or the bridges below Croton. Those would never get catenary. The extra cost would never be justified and the NIMBYs are going to be too strong against the poles messing up their views of the Hudson. North of Croton is much easier, but it is really dependent on the state whether it wants to pony up the money for the catenary and realistically I do not see it. It is a lot of wire to justify it up to Poughkeepsie or Albany. Diesels it will be for my and your lifetime. The diesels will probably get some Tesla like batteries to address the gaping issue across switches, but wire ... I do not see it.

User avatar
GirlOnTheTrain
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: Metro-North Hudson Line Electrification

Post by GirlOnTheTrain »

They're never gonna string wire to Poughkeepsie. I think CTrailfan is the only person who thinks it's a logical idea.
"I am no longer just a girl on the train, going back and forth without point or purpose."

Moderator: Amtrak, MTA Metro-North, MTA New York City Subway/PATH/NYC Area Light Rail

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8698
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: If it's Tuesday, It Must Be Belgium

Re: Metro-North Hudson Line Electrification

Post by Jeff Smith »

A few years back, it MAY have been mentioned in a 20-year plan by MNRR. I'm pretty sure it was for third rail, not catenary. Catenary makes no sense at all for MNRR, and either would require an EIS that would take years and generate much opposition.
Next stop, Willoughby
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

User avatar
Rockingham Racer
Posts: 3696
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:25 pm

Re: Metro-North Hudson Line Electrification

Post by Rockingham Racer »

Jeff Smith wrote:
Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:34 am
A few years back, it MAY have been mentioned in a 20-year plan by MNRR. I'm pretty sure it was for third rail, not catenary. Catenary makes no sense at all for MNRR, and either would require an EIS that would take years and generate much opposition.
When I used to hang out at JO Tower in Woodlawn, the rumor was on the move then, too. That was around 1970.

nomis
Posts: 2194
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:52 pm
Location: MRS 20 (was QA 9 & QB 2)

Re: Metro-North Hudson Line Electrification

Post by nomis »

Mod Note: moved the Danbury Re-electrification talk to the Danbury thread which has the study and historical info in the 20+ some pages.
Moderator: Metro-North (with CDOT), Photography & Video

Avatar: An overnight trip on Girard Ave. stumbles upon 6 PCC's and an LRV stuck within two blocks.

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8698
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: If it's Tuesday, It Must Be Belgium

Re: Electrification on the Hudson Line

Post by Jeff Smith »

Bump
Next stop, Willoughby
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

Return to “MTA Metro-North Railroad and CtDOT Passenger Rail”